On 14 March 1998 they brought unsuccessful proceedings before Oslo City Court, complaining that their exemption requests had been turned down.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. A.     Criminal proceedings against two officers 3 .

She complained before the civil court which ruled in her favour in May 2002 ordering that she regain occupation of her room in the apartment.

Jebens, juges , et de M. S.

2016, par Mme [Q] le 18 mai 2016, faisant suite au premier appel à candidature affiché en mairies le 10 mai 2016 et celle présentée par le Gfr Fauconnet le 5 septembre 2016, faisant suite au deuxième

Il donna sa version des faits et affirma   : «   j'ai participé à la marche, mais je n'ai pas fait du mal à une autre personne. Je demande que ma vie me soit restituée.

The subsequent defendants' appeal was declared inadmissible in a decision of the Split Municipal Court adopted on 24 May 2002 which was upheld by the Split County Court on 7 March 2003.

Jebens,     G. Malinverni, juges, et de M. S.

Jebens, judges , and Mr S.

On 14 March 2002, having regard to the fact that counsel was unable to appear on two of the relevant dates in May 2002, the High Court decided to re-schedule the trial.

The applicant had planted and detonated a bomb in a car, killing its passengers, a man and his two young children, aged 11 and 13.

Jebens ,   Mr   G. Malinverni, judges , and Mr S.

The decision was amended – increasing the charges – and republished in the Official Gazette on 9 March 2007.

    Procédure et composition de la Cour   Saisie de la requête le 23 mai 2002, la Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme l’a déclarée partiellement recevable le 5 octobre 2006.

On 28 March 1996 the applicants obtained a notary deed to ascertain their title to the real estate.

Between 29 March and 16 May 1996 he made five more applications. On 4 April 1996 the prosecutor informed the applicant that his son was not on any custody records.

    On 21 March 2018 the Constitutional Court found a violation of the right to a fair trial of the applicant and 413 others who had filed applications on the same matter.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Volchkov v.