The second applicant is the wife of Mr Suliman Isayev and the third applicant is the wife of Mr Ramzan Isayev. 1.     Disappearance of Mr Rumid Isayev and subsequent events 9.

    The applicants complained under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention that they had been ill-treated by the police during the dispersal of the demonstration and that their complaints in this

The parents had thus significantly neglected their duty to raise and educate them, as they had not taken sufficient care of their health within the meaning of section 111(1) and (2) of the Family Act (

the killing of their father.

Considering this development, on 13   January 2010 the applicant noted that he had accepted the terms of the friendly settlement declaration proposed by the Registry more than a year earlier and that

  Complaint   The applicants allege that the occupation of their land had infringed their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions, guaranteed by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection

The assistant informed the head of this request, who, in response, called the police. 9 .

their allegations about the manner in which their property had been destroyed. 13.

2013, Having regard to the interim measure indicated to the respondent Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and the fact that this interim measure has been complied with, Having regard to the

The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs R. Lazareska Gerovska.

, to give notice of this part of the application to the respondent Government.

He was represented before the Court by Mr A. Mahleliev, a lawyer practising in Sofia. The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs   S.

The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs   M.   Kotzeva of the Ministry of Justice.

She was represented before the Court by Mr T.P. Dimov, a lawyer practising in Plovdiv. The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms M.

The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. The applicant’s complaints that the conditions of his detention in Donetsk Pre-Trial Detention Centre no.

They were represented before the Court by Mr D. Mitkov and Ms S. Vasileva, lawyers practising in Sofia. The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms R.

He was represented before the Court by Mr D. Mitkov and Mrs S. Vasileva, lawyers practising in Sofia. The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs R.

He was represented before the Court by Ms S. Lyubenova-Neykova, a lawyer practising in Sofia. The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms M.

She was represented before the Court by Mr Y. Fedorchuk, a lawyer practising in Dnipropetrovsk. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms I.