Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169575
14 novembre 2016
14 novembre 2016
Has the applicant been subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention, as a result of the acts inflicted on her by A.G.? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-118653
18 mars 2013
18 mars 2013
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his home, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201925
27 février 2020
27 février 2020
Was the application of domestic labour legislation in the applicant’s case discriminatory, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202677
30 mars 2020
30 mars 2020
Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their private and family life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-247887
1 décembre 2025
1 décembre 2025
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for their private and family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in particular in so far as their marriage
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198693
3 novembre 2019
3 novembre 2019
Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their private and family life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in particular in so far as they had no other possibility
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113326
9 juin 2011
9 juin 2011
Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their private and family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214564
1 décembre 2021
1 décembre 2021
Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-162400
29 mars 2016
29 mars 2016
Before ordering the applicant’s administrative removal on 20 June 2015, did the authorities consider the applicant’s claim that he would be exposed to the risk of suffering treatment contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-189565
18 décembre 2018
18 décembre 2018
Has there been a violation of the applicants’ freedom of thought, conscience or religion, contrary to Article 9 of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-246034
13 octobre 2025
13 octobre 2025
annulled the administrative act on 3 October 2019 on the grounds that the interview evaluation form did not specify the reasons for the low scores given to the applicant, which was found to be contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-234745
3 juin 2024
3 juin 2024
37685/10 and 22768/12, § 114, 20 March 2018), has the applicant suffered discrimination on account of his locomotor disability in the enjoyment of his right to private life, contrary to Article
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216618
2 mars 2022
2 mars 2022
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and/or contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216864
17 mars 2022
17 mars 2022
developed in the Court’s case-law and on the basis of which life sentences could, in appropriate cases, be reduced, thus that the imposition of such a sentence on the applicant could not be said to be contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225810
14 juin 2023
14 juin 2023
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, with regard to the manner in which the Bacău Court of Appeal
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-233707
15 avril 2024
15 avril 2024
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her home and/or her private life in the present case, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, particularly bearing
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244115
10 juin 2025
10 juin 2025
The opposing parties raised an inadmissibility objection, claiming that the submission was contrary to a provision of the Lawyers’ Code, which barred lawyers from practising outside the prefecture of their
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225150
11 mai 2023
11 mai 2023
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, with regard to the manner in which the Cluj Court of Appeal (
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179385
13 novembre 2017
13 novembre 2017
If yes, did the statements breach the applicants’ right to respect for their private life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention or amount to discrimination on the ground of their sexual orientation contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-237819
4 octobre 2024
4 octobre 2024
Romania , nos. 81114/17 and 5 others, § 14, 13 October 2020), the power to set aside a law deemed discriminatory or contrary to the Convention was exclusively reserved to the CCR.
Source officiellePage 10 sur 1005