CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

301 résultats pour « Audrey MATZ »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CA

Pôle 5 - Chambre 2

6032809c358b2cb485593932

Appel

19 janvier 2018

19 janvier 2018

[U] [U] Né le [Date naissance 5] 1970 à [Localité 2] De nationalité française Exerçant la profession d'auteur dessinateur réalisateur Demeurant [Adresse 6] Représentés par Me Audrey LOUAPRE, avocat

Source officielle

Page 10 sur 16

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0304REP001898491

Admin. suprême

4 mars 1994

4 mars 1994

Audrey Glover, of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.   4.

Source officielle
CAA

1ère chambre - formation à 3

DCA_22NC02148_20260507

Admin. Appel

7 mai 2026

7 mai 2026

Saint-Maurice-sur-Vingeanne, Montigny-Mornay-Villeneuve-sur-Vingeanne, Pouilly-sur-Vingeanne, Ecuelle, Véronnes, Lux, FontaineFrançaise, Saint-Seine-sur-Vingeanne, Vars, Auvet-la-Chapelotte, Fahy-lès-Autrey

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0612JUD002606402

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2008

12 juin 2008

their relative, Ramzan Kukuyev, had disappeared after having been unlawfully detained by Russian servicemen and that the domestic authorities had failed to carry out an effective investigation into the matter

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011JUD003535005

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2011

11 octobre 2011

Subsequently, the matter was subject to examination by the courts, with the final decision on the matter taken on 11   March 2005.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0405JUD001039304

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2011

5 avril 2011

    The matter was assigned to an assistant prosecutor. On 22 August 2003 he questioned an on-duty officer who had provided officer Sh. with the help from officers Po. and S.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD002021205

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2012

17 janvier 2012

    The applicant alleged that he had been ill-treated while in State custody and that the domestic authorities had failed to investigate the matter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1208JUD006743709

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2015

8 décembre 2015

Aslan Dudayev, during an attack on her house and had abducted and subsequently killed her husband, Mr Ali Dudayev, and that the authorities had failed to carry out an effective investigation into the matter

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD001801112

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2016

21 juin 2016

    The applicant alleged that in March 2012 his brother had been abducted by State servicemen in Ingushetia and that no effective investigation into the matter had taken place. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0207DEC000541003

Admin. suprême

7 février 2006

7 février 2006

been finally settled at the domestic level (see, for example, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom , (dec.) no. 46477/99, 7 June 2001).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1006JUD008044212

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2015

6 octobre 2015

The reason for doing so had been that the two subject-matters were assigned to two different judge rapporteurs respectively.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0723JUD000445810

Admin. suprême

23 juillet 2013

23 juillet 2013

In the meantime, on 7 February 2010 a chest X-ray was performed at Mater Dei Hospital, but no abnormalities were detected.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0903DEC001898491

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 1993

3 septembre 1993

Audrey Glover                Agent Mr.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0915JUD003784713

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2015

15 septembre 2015

importance, given that the essential purpose of such an investigation is to secure the effective implementation of the domestic laws which protect the right to life (see mutatis mutandis , Paul and Audrey

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0105JUD002340104

Admin. suprême

5 janvier 2010

5 janvier 2010

regard to the fact that the essential purpose of such an investigation is to secure the effective implementation of the domestic laws which protect the right to life (see mutatis mutandis , Paul and Audrey

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0521DEC000127811

Admin. suprême

21 mai 2013

21 mai 2013

To then discontinue the proceedings as they did, thereby depriving the national courts of the opportunity of ruling on the subject-matter of complaint ultimately submitted to this Court, would normally

Source officielle
CA

5ème chambre sociale PH

6868b37c75a2d196dbc19195

Appel

4 juillet 2025

4 juillet 2025

APPELANTE : Madame [H] [C] née le 21 Février 1965 à [Localité 8] [Adresse 3] [Localité 1] Représentée par Me Audrey GRANDGONNET de la SELARL CABINET BALESTAS GRANDGONNET MURIDI, avocat au barreau

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1010JUD003297220

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2024

10 octobre 2024

    Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0411DEC006990801

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2006

11 avril 2006

Article 35 §   1 cannot be interpreted, however, in a manner which would require an applicant to refer his complaint to the Court before his position in connection with the matter has been finally

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1215JUD003876505

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2011

15 décembre 2011

Prosecutor’s Office (hereafter “the VTPO”) that the persons with whom her son had been fighting could have been involved in his death and sought the initiation of a criminal investigation into the matter

Source officielle