CEDHPRESS;GENERAL;ENG
CEDH · PRESS;GENERAL;ENG — 7 mai 1998
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:003-67993-68461
- Date
- 7 mai 1998
- Publication
- 7 mai 1998
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulAnalyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s13F94BDE { font-family:Arial; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block } .s556ED54D { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .sB720765B { width:135.78pt; display:inline-block } .sA6A9D40F { width:96.39pt; display:inline-block } .sD979AC8C { width:206.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC48D86C2 { width:77.13pt; display:inline-block } .s85226119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .sB024CFF8 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .sB90861A5 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .s9D97FB8D { width:203.95pt; display:inline-block } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s9CFAD0CB { width:32.34pt; display:inline-block } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sFA39485D { width:83.97pt; display:inline-block } .s97692B39 { width:57.55pt; display:inline-block } .s671AECC3 { width:52.86pt; display:inline-block } .s67020D35 { width:54.76pt; display:inline-block } .s86B18E65 { width:78.98pt; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s118BA563 { width:78.99pt; display:inline-block } .s9D064793 { width:51.98pt; display:inline-block } .sFA518779 { width:126.76pt; display:inline-block } .sFA124149 { width:95.08pt; display:inline-block } .s8EB5F569 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super } .sE95CF9CF { width:102.3pt; display:inline-block } .s908E57E3 { width:103.43pt; display:inline-block } .sFDEE94A6 { width:93.43pt; display:inline-block } .sE8C8DD2 { width:95.09pt; display:inline-block } .s709D0254 { width:95.66pt; display:inline-block } .s8395FE42 { width:119.54pt; display:inline-block } .s2589503F { width:62.3pt; display:inline-block } .s9ADC0F46 { width:101.21pt; display:inline-block } .s33DB4A17 { width:119.01pt; display:inline-block } .s4C7E8BFE { width:102.31pt; display:inline-block } .sB175F68C { width:80.64pt; display:inline-block } .sD754489 { width:83.99pt; display:inline-block } .s93FFB312 { width:49.2pt; display:inline-block } .s619DCD92 { width:107.31pt; display:inline-block } .s2A63993 { width:106.21pt; display:inline-block } .s225728D7 { width:106.24pt; display:inline-block } .sA69E80BE { width:99pt; display:inline-block } .sE9FEE40E { width:109.55pt; display:inline-block } .s233491CF { width:101.78pt; display:inline-block } .s9285FC7D { width:73.43pt; display:inline-block } .sD93BD442 { width:89.51pt; display:inline-block } .s7625EFF8 { width:97.32pt; display:inline-block } .s84412A66 { width:121.77pt; display:inline-block } .sB8D20D14 { width:114.54pt; display:inline-block } .s5DEDF2BA { width:58.43pt; display:inline-block } .sF25D2575 { width:100.64pt; display:inline-block } .sAC9EC55A { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:297.7pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-297.7pt; font-size:10pt } .s9B1C4FF1 { width:22.29pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s6F93BB72 { width:49.2pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s29ED96A1 { width:111.77pt; display:inline-block } .sDED67B32 { width:72.28pt; display:inline-block } .sB3159364 { width:123.42pt; display:inline-block } .sB3C0DC34 { width:115.11pt; display:inline-block } .sD0B74930 { width:125.65pt; display:inline-block } .s497224C5 { width:118.99pt; display:inline-block } .s4B98E379 { width:48.96pt; display:inline-block } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline }                             HUMAN RIGHTS NEWS                       325                     7.5.1998         Press release issued jointly by the     Registrar of the European Court of Human Rights   and the   Secretary to the European Commission of Human Rights       FIRST MEETING OF THE JUDGES ELECT OF THE NEW EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS       The 39 Judges elect of the new full-time European Court of Human Rights held their first meeting in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, from 28 April to 2 May 1998.   The new Court will come into operation on 1 November 1998 with the entry into force of Protocol No. 11 to the European Convention on Human Rights.   The Judges, who were elected by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe in January and April, discussed the preparatory steps that may have to be taken before the Court assumes its functions.     The Judges elect set up two working parties, one to prepare the Rules of Court and the other to deal with administrative questions.   Both working parties were able to hold a first session before the end of the meeting.   The meeting was chaired by Mr Benedetto Conforti as the doyen d'âge .     *      *      *     The new Court will replace the two existing, part-time bodies responsible for ensuring that the Contracting Parties comply with their obligations under the Convention, namely the present European Court and Commission of Human Rights.   For the first time, the citizens of the Member States of the Council of Europe and the States themselves will be able to take their complaints of human rights violations under the Convention directly before an international tribunal.     The background to this reform is the growing difficulty experienced by the present institutions in coping with the ever-increasing volume of cases and the consequent need to streamline the enforcement mechanism.   The elimination of the time-consuming examination of cases by two separate bodies is the principal element of the reform.     Under Protocol No. 11 the jurisdiction of the Court will be compulsory, whereas under the present system acceptance of both the right of individual petition to the Commission and of the Court's jurisdiction is optional.   Another feature of the existing system that will disappear is the adjudicative role of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, which at present determines complaints in cases declared admissible by the Commission but not subsequently referred to the Court.   The Committee of Ministers will, however, retain its present responsibility for supervising the execution of the Court's judgments.   2     The new Court will be composed of a number of judges equal to the number of Contracting Parties.   The judges will sit in their individual capacity, and may be re-elected.     The Court's seat will, like its predecessor's, be at the Human Rights Building in Strasbourg. For the examination of cases, it will sit in committees of three members, which may reject cases unanimously where such a decision can be taken without further examination, in Chambers of seven and in a Grand Chamber of seventeen.   The Chambers will decide on the admissibility and merits of cases which cannot be dealt with by a committee, but they may relinquish jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber when a case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation of the Convention or the Protocols, or when the resolution of a question before the Chamber might have a result inconsistent with a judgment previously delivered by the Court.   The parties may, however, object to the relinquishment of jurisdiction by a Chamber.     The plenary Court will elect a President, one or two Vice-Presidents and the Presidents of the Chambers, each of whom will sit as an ex officio member of the Grand Chamber, as will the judge elected in respect of the State Party concerned.   The plenary Court will also adopt the Rules of Court and set up the Chambers.     A special feature of the new Court is the possibility for parties to request referral of a case to the Grand Chamber within three months of delivery of the judgment by a Chamber.   A panel of five judges of the Grand Chamber will decide whether to accept the request.     The Protocol makes provision for certain transitional arrangements:   -   all cases pending before the present Court on entry into force of the Protocol will be transmitted to the Grand Chamber of the new Court;   -   all cases pending before the Commission in respect of which there has not been a decision on admissibility at the date of entry into force of the Protocol will be transferred directly to the new Court;   -   the Commission will continue for a period of one year to process cases which it has already declared admissible. 3   LISTE DES JUGES ELUS A LA NOUVELLE COUR - LIST OF JUDGES ELECT   (par ordre de préséance / in order of precedence)       M. Benedetto CONFORTI   3. 9.1930   (Italien/Italian) M. Antonio PASTOR RIDRUEJO   6.12.1932   (Espagnol/Spanish) M. Luigi FERRARI BRAVO   5. 8.1933   (Italien/Italian) [1] M. Gaukur JÖRUNDSSON   24. 9.1934   (Islandais/Icelandic) M. Georg RESS   21. 1.1935   (Allemand/German) M. Giovanni BONELLO   11. 6.1936   (Maltais/Maltese) M me Elisabeth PALM   27. 7.1936   (Suédoise/Swedish) M. Lucius CAFLISCH   31. 8.1936   (Suisse/Swiss) [2] M. Luzius WILDHABER   18. 1.1937   (Suisse/Swiss) M. Loukis LOUCAIDES   3.10.1937   (Cypriote/Cypriot) M. Jerzy MAKARCZYK   24. 7.1938   (Polonais/Polish) M. Pranas KŪRIS   20. 8.1938   (Lituanien/Lithuanian) M. Ireneu CABRAL BARRETO   5. 2.1941   (Portugais/Portuguese) M. Christos ROZAKIS   17. 5.1941   (Grec/Greek) M. Riza TÜRMEN   17. 6.1941   (Turc/Turkish) M. Jean-Paul COSTA   3.11.1941   (Français/French) M me Françoise TULKENS   12. 9.1942   (Belge/Belgian) M me Viera STRÁŽNICKÁ   28.12.1942   (Slovaque/Slovakian) M. Corneliu BIRSAN   16.12.1943   (Roumain/Romanian) M. Peer LORENZEN   20. 5.1944   (Danois/Danish) M. Willi FÜHRMANN   4. 7.1944   (Autrichien/Austrian) M. Karel JUNGWIERT   1.11.1944   (Tchèque/Czech) M. Nicolas BRATZA   3. 3.1945   (Britannique/British) M. Marc FISCHBACH   22. 2.1946   (Luxembourgeois/Luxemburger) M. Volodymyr BUTKEVYCH   2. 8.1946   (Ukrainien/Ukrainian) M. Josep CASADEVALL   10. 9.1946   (Andorran) M. Boštjan ZUPANČIČ   13. 5.1947   (Slovène/Slovenian) M me Nina VAJIĆ   22. 2.1948   (Croate/Croatian) M. John HEDIGAN   14.10.1948   (Irlandais/Irish) M me Wilhelmina THOMASSEN   8. 9.1949   (Néerlandaise/Dutch) M. Matti PELLONPÄÄ   4. 4.1950   (Finlandais/Finnish) M me Margarita TSATSA NIKOLOVSKA   28.11.1950   (ressortissante de "l'ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine"/citizen of "the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia") M. Tudor PANTIRU   26.10.1951   (Moldave/Moldovan) M me Hanne Sophie GREVE   14. 4.1952   (Norvégienne/Norwegian) M. András BAKA   11.12.1952   (Hongrois/Hungarian) M. Rait MARUSTE   27. 9.1953   (Estonien/Estonian) M. Egils LEVITS   30. 6.1955   (Letton/Latvian) M. Kristaq TRAJA   17. 8.1955   (Albanais/Albanian) M me Snejana BOTOUCHAROVA   20. 9.1955   (Bulgare/Bulgarian) Notes   [1] Elu au titre de Saint-Marin. / Elected as the judge in respect of San Marino. [2] Elu au titre du Liechtenstein. / Elected as the judge in respect of Liechtenstein.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
- Date
- 7 mai 1998
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:003-67993-68461
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel