CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 24 août 1998

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sEB86A30B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s9FF10068 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s85F2E5C5 { width:30.44pt; display:inline-block } .s6863D229 { width:26pt; display:inline-block } .sBDAE81C4 { width:27.67pt; display:inline-block } .s5CB9E8AB { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. August 1998 Benkessiouer v. France - 26106/95 Judgment 24.8.1998 Article 6 Administrative proceedings Article 6-1 Civil rights and obligations Reasonable time Length of proceedings brought by a Post Office civil servant for judicial review of decisions to refuse him extended sick-leave, to suspend payment of his salary and to put him on notice to return to work or face dismissal, and for damages: violation   [This summary is extracted from the Court’s official reports (Series A or Reports of Judgments and Decisions ). Its formatting and structure may therefore differ from the Case-Law Information Note summaries.] I.   ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION A.   Applicability Disputes relating to the recruitment, careers and termination of service of civil servants are as a general rule outside the scope of Article 6 § 1. Applicant’s claims in Administrative Court had been intended mainly to secure quashing of decisions to refuse him extended sick-leave and suspend payment of his salary – grant of such leave would have enabled him to enjoy salary benefits set out in section 34 of the Law of 11 January 1984 making provisions governing the civil service – claims had been for an essentially economic right which did not mainly put in issue the authorities’ special rights. Applicant’s claims had been civil ones. Conclusion : Article 6 § 1 applicable (seven votes to two). B.   Compliance First set of proceedings: Starting-point: application to Paris Administrative Court. End: judgment. Total: four years, five months and fifteen days. Second set of proceedings, for an interim order: Starting-point: application to Paris Administrative Court. End: judgment of Conseil d’Etat. Total: one year, eleven months and ten days. Proceedings for interim order had been completed within a reasonable time. Long period of inactivity attributable to judicial authorities in connection with first set of proceedings – reasonable time exceeded. Conclusion : violation (seven votes to two). II.   ARTICLE 50 OF THE CONVENTION Pecuniary damage: no causal link between violation found and damage sustained by applicant. Non-pecuniary damage: sum awarded on equitable basis. Conclusion : respondent State to pay applicant a specified sum for non-pecuniary damage (unanimously).   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes