CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 18 mai 1999
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-6380
- Date
- 18 mai 1999
- Publication
- 18 mai 1999
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleInadmissible
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 6 May 1999 Wolff Metternich v. the Netherlands (dec.) - 45908/99 Decision 18.5.1999 [Section I] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Civil rights and obligations Applicant claiming right to be included in the ancestry register, conferring entitlement to hold a title of nobility: inadmissible The family of the applicant’s mother belongs to the Dutch nobility and is entitled to hold the noble title of Count ( Graaf ). The family of the applicant’s father, however, does not belong to the Dutch nobility. Following his parents’ divorce, the applicant officially changed his family name to his mother’s maiden name. He then requested the authorities to include him in the Netherlands ancestry register, so as to be entitled to hold the noble title of Graaf . His request, as well as his appeals, were rejected on the ground that Dutch nobility was only transferred through the paternal line. Inadmissible under Article 6 § 1: According to the Dutch Act on Nobility, noble status can be obtained in only three ways, i.e. at birth, by transmission via the paternal line;   by elevation of a person belonging to the royal family;   or by incorporation where a foreign person holding a noble status recognised in the country of origin obtains Dutch nationality. The applicant did not belong to any of these categories. The absence of any discretion in the applicable domestic statutory rules as to the enoblement of persons not being part of these three categories showed that no right was recognised in Dutch law. Therefore, the applicant’s claim did not concern a “right” which could arguably be said to be recognised in the Netherlands and could not be regarded as falling within the scope of Article 6: incompatible ratione materiae .   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 18 mai 1999
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-6380
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel