CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 26 août 2003
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-4741
- Date
- 26 août 2003
- Publication
- 26 août 2003
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleInadmissible
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 56 September 2003 Breisacher v. France (dec) - 76976/01 Decision 26.8.2003 [Section II] Article 34 Non-governmental organisation Application lodged by a person wishing to act in the defence of the interests of a local authority: inadmissible The applicant was granted leave to claim civil damages in place of the City of Paris in a judicial investigation into misappropriation of which the City of Paris was alleged to be the victim in a public tendering procedure. The applicant took advantage of the possibility available to a taxpayer of a municipality to exercise, with leave of the administrative court, the actions which he believes the municipality should have brought but which it has failed to exercise. Inadmissible under Article 34: The applicant is acting not in his personal capacity but in place of the City of Paris in defending the latter’s interests. Independently of the fact that the applicant is not the City of Paris’s legal representative, it has consistently been held that a municipality is a legal person governed by public law and must be classified as a governmental organisation: incompatible ratione personae .   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 26 août 2003
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-4741
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel