CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 30 octobre 2003
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-4687
- Date
- 30 octobre 2003
- Publication
- 30 octobre 2003
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officiellePecuniary damage - financial award;Non-pecuniary damage - financial award;Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 57 October 2003 Belvedere Alberghiera S.r.l. v. Italy - 31524/96 Judgment 30.10.2003 [Section II] Article 41 Just satisfaction Appointment of expert to assess pecuniary loss In a judgment of 30 May 2000, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, on the ground that the applicant company had been unlawfully deprived of its land. The question of Article 41 was reserved. In the subsequent proceedings the Chamber decided, on its President’s initiative, that it would be appropriate to conduct an expert evaluation with regard to the question of pecuniary damage. Accordingly, the Court assigned terms of reference to an expert selected by the parties and noted that the costs and fees for the evaluation would be payable by the respondent State. The parties had an opportunity to submit observations on the evaluation. Article 41 – The Court decided to accept as valid the expert’s report and to take it into consideration in its decision on pecuniary damage. With regard to the sum to be awarded under this head, the Court endorsed the expert’s conclusions.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 30 octobre 2003
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-4687
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel