CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 16 avril 2021

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Legal summary October 2023 Pindo Mulla v. Spain (relinquishment) - 15541/20   Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Medical treatment in the form of blood transfusions administered to Jehovah’s Witness against her will: relinquishment in favour of the Grand Chamber Article 9 Article 9-1 Freedom of conscience Freedom of religion Medical treatment in the form of blood transfusions administered to Jehovah’s Witness against her will: relinquishment in favour of the Grand Chamber The applicant, a Jehovah’s Witness, was admitted to Soria Hospital and due to life-threatening health issues was transferred to a hospital in Madrid. The hospital, knowing the applicant was a Jehovah’s Witness who had reportedly refused any medical treatment, requested permission to safeguard her life and physical integrity from the duty judge. The judge, who did not know the identity of the applicant nor her precise wishes, rendered a decision ordering to save the applicant’s life. Pursuant to this decision a surgery was performed and blood transfusions were administered to the applicant who had not been informed of the duty judge’s order. This decision was upheld on appeal and by the Constitutional Court. The applicant complains under Articles 8 and 9 that while her refusal to certain medical treatments had been clearly established in many official relevant documents, they were ignored by domestic authorities. On 4 July 2023 a Chamber of the Court relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. To access legal summaries in English or French click here . For non-official translations into other languages click here .