CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 15 septembre 2009
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-1354
- Date
- 15 septembre 2009
- Publication
- 15 septembre 2009
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleInadmissible
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sEB86A30B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s9FF10068 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s5CB9E8AB { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. 122 August-September 2009 "Blondje" v. the Netherlands (dec.) - 7245/09 Decision 15.9.2009 [Section III] Article 35 Article 35-2 Anonymous petition Failure to disclose identity in application to European Court: inadmissible   Facts – The applicant was arrested on suspicion of various offences. He refused to identify himself and was detained for a period of seven days in total to enable his identity to be established. His appeals against that deprivation of liberty were rejected. The applicant subsequently complained to the European Court under Articles   5, 6 and   14 of the Convention. Law – Article 35 § 2 (a): The applicant’s identity had not been disclosed. None of the forms or documents submitted contained a mention of his name. He was referred to only as “Blondje alias   NN cel   07 alias Nn.PI09.m.20081101.1100” and the power of attorney that had been submitted was signed   “X”. Since the case file did not indicate any element enabling the Court to identify the applicant, the application was to be regarded as anonymous. Conclusion : inadmissible (anonymous application).   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 15 septembre 2009
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-1354
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel