CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 31 octobre 2007

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sA527F4CF { font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sF8AEFD1F { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC707261C { height:9.85pt } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s23ADBB69 { font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Resolution CM/ResDH(2007)142 [1] Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 14 cases concerning non-execution of court orders to evict tenants against Italy   (Application Nos. (see details in Appendix), friendly settlements)   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee once they had become final;   Recalling that the admissible complaints in these cases concerned systematic infringements of landlords'   right to respect for their property because of failure to implement domestic court decisions ordering the eviction of the tenants, this failure results from a combination of the staggering of executions, the lack of assistance from the police and legislation authorising temporary suspension;   Whereas in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent state and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols decided, unanimously, to strike these cases out of its list and took note of the parties' undertaking not to request a re-hearing of the cases before the Grand Chamber;   Whereas under these friendly settlements it was agreed that the government of the respondent state would pay the applicants certain sums (see details in Appendix), within three months as from the notification of the judgments;   Recalling that the striking-out of a case which has been declared admissible is effected by means of a judgment which the President forwards to the Committee of Ministers once it has become final in order to allow it to supervise, in accordance with Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the execution of any undertakings which may have been attached to the discontinuance, friendly settlement or solution of the matter;   Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article   46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the judgments;   Having examined the information provided by the government in accordance with the Committee's Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that the government of the respondent state paid the applicants the sums provided for in the friendly settlement, in conditions accepted by the applicants (see details in Appendix);   Whereas during the examination of the cases by the Committee of Ministers, the government of the respondent state recalled that measures had already been taken to avoid new complaints of the same kind as that found in these cases (see Resolution DH(2007)84 in the cases Immobiliare Saffi and 156 other cases against Italy);   Having examined the information supplied by the government of Italy,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention with respect to the commitments subscribed to in these cases and DECIDES to close their examination.       Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2007)142   Information about the measures to comply with the judgments in 14 cases concerning non-execution of court orders to evict tenants against Italy     Details of payments   Case name and application No. Date of Judgment, final on Global amount in ITL Date of payment BIFFONI 46079/99 24/10/2002 final on 24/10/2002 7 500 10/02/2003 CANDELA 35997/97 30/01/2003 final on 30/01/2003 8 000 07/05/2003 CARLONI TARLI 48840/99 30/05/2003 final on 30/05/2003 5 000 08/10/2003 F. and F. 31928/96 24/10/2002 final on 24/10/2002 6 000 10/02/2003 FERRETTI 60660/00 06/03/2003 final on 06/03/2003 6 085 30/06/2003 FIORENTINI VIZZINI 39451/98 19/12/2002 final on 19/12/2002 6 000 08/04/2003 G.G. 42414/98 20/02/2003, final on 20/02/2003 5 085 26/06/2003 GIANOTTI 39690/98 03/10/2002 final on 03/10/2002 4 500 29/01/2003 NOTARGIACOMO 63600/00 09/10/2003 final on 09/10/2003 7 100 20/01/2004 NUTI 60662/00 03/07/2003 final on 03/07/2003 6 200 21/10/2003 SARTORELLI 47895/99 24/10/2002 final on 24/10/2002 12 000 10/02/2003 SAVARESE 55673/00 20/02/2003 final on 20/02/2003 2 500 09/07/2003 TACCHINO and SCORZA 34714/97 18/07/2002 final on 18/07/2002 6 500 29/10/2002 VISCA 36734/97 07/11/2002 final on 07/11/2002 10 500 11/02/2003   [1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 31 October 2007 at the 1007th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies