CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 31 octobre 2007

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sA527F4CF { font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sF8AEFD1F { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBD4F1DE { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:8.75pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s3DDF0EFC { width:29.32pt; display:inline-block } .sBF92C200 { width:29.99pt; display:inline-block } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s23ADBB69 { font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Resolution CM/ResDH(2007)141 [1] Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 61 cases concerning the excessive length of certain proceedings related to civil rights and obligations before labour courts against Italy   (Application Nos. (see details in Appendix), friendly settlements)   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee once they had become final;   Recalling that the admissible complaints in these cases concerned the excessive length of certain proceedings related to civil rights and obligations before labour courts;   Whereas in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent state and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols decided, unanimously, to strike these cases out of its list and took note of the parties' undertaking not to request a re-hearing of the cases before the Grand Chamber;   Whereas under these friendly settlements it was agreed that the government of the respondent state would pay the applicants certain sums (see details in Appendix), within three months as from the notification of the judgments;   Recalling that the striking-out of a case which has been declared admissible is effected by means of a judgment which the President forwards to the Committee of Ministers once it has become final in order to allow it to supervise, in accordance with Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the execution of any undertakings which may have been attached to the discontinuance, friendly settlement or solution of the matter;   Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article   46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the judgments;   Having examined the information provided by the government in accordance with the Committee's Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that the government of the respondent state paid the applicants the sums provided for in the friendly settlements, in conditions accepted by the applicants (see details in Appendix);   Recalling that, as regard the applicants' complaints declared admissible in these cases, the Committee of Ministers is at present supervising the execution of several judgments of the Court and decisions of the Committee of Ministers, under previous Article 32 of the Convention, finding a violation of Article 6, paragraph   1, of the Convention on account of the excessive length of proceedings before the Italian civil courts;   Whereas, in this connection, the Italian authorities informed the Committee of Ministers that they were drafting and adopting new general measures in order to put to an end the serious problem of excessive length of proceedings, so as to prevent new violations similar to those already found in the above-mentioned cases (see Resolutions DH(97)336, DH(99)437, DH(2000)135 and CM/ResDH(2007)2),   Having examined the information supplied by the government of Italy,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention with respect to the commitments subscribed to in these cases and DECIDES to close their examination.       Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2007)141   Information about the measures to comply with the judgments in 61 cases concerning the excessive length of certain proceedings related to civil rights and obligations before labour courts against Italy     Details of payments   Case name and application No. Date of judgment, final on Non- pecuniary damage in ITL Costs and expenses in ITL Date of payment ASCIERTO 40363/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 13 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 BELLO 43063/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 19 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 BUCCI 40975/98 05/04/2000, final on 05/07/2000 25 000 000 5 000 000 19/07/2000 C. B. 43094/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 13 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 CACCIACARRO 42999/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 13 000 000 3 000 000 30/11/2000 CESARE 43085/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 23 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 CESARE 43086/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 23 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 CIARAMELLA 43020/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 11 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 COCCA 42996/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 11 000 000 3 000 000 30/11/2000 COPPOLARO 43088/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 19 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 D'ADDONA 43083/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 11 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 D'AMBROSIO 43017/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 13 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 D'ANTONOLI 43059/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 19 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 DATTILO 40960/98 05/04/2000, final on 05/07/2000 25 000 000 5 000 000 19/07/2000 Del BUONO 43054/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 19 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 Di BIASE 43051/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 17 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 Di BLASIO 43062/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 15 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 Case name and application No. Date of judgment, final on Non- pecuniary damage in ITL Costs and expenses in ITL Date of payment Di LIBERO 43030/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 15 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 Di MELLA 43022/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 11 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 FALLARINO 43056/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 13 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 FOSCHINI 43058/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 15 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 G. A. 43096/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 9 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 G. P. 43093/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 11 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 GALLO 43075/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 23 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 GIOIA 38975/97 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 9 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 GIOIA 43050/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 23 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 GRASSO 43074/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 19 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 GUARINO 43072/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 13 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 IADAROLA 43091/98 27/06/2000, final on 27/09/2000 9 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 IANNOTTA 42998/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 13 000 000 3 000 000 30/11/2000 IANNOTTI 43101/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 13 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 IAPALUCCI 43021/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 15 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 IZZO 43067/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 17 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 LANNI 43065/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 23 000 000 3 000 000 04/12/2000 LEPORE and AL 43102/98 27/06/2000, final on 27/09/2000 30 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 LUCIANO 43068/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 17 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 M. C. 43095/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 9 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 MANNELLO 43010/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 13 000 000 3 000 000 08/02/2001 MASELLI 43000/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 15 000 000 3 000 000 30/11/2000 MEOLI 43018/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 8 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 MERCONE 43069/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 11 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 MONGILLO 43057/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 11 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 NICOLELLA 43064/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 19 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 ORSINI 43100/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 15 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 P. T. 43076/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 11 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 PALUMBO 43012/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 11 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 Case name and application No. Date of judgment, final on Non- pecuniary damage in ITL Costs and expenses in ITL Date of payment PANZANELLA 43052/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 23 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 PATUTO 43061/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 15 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 PIZZI 43060/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 15 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 POZELLA 43023/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 11 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 ROTONDI 43087/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 23 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 RUBORTONE 43019/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 11 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 SABATINO 43055/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 13 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 SANTILLO 43099/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 13 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 SQUILLACE 42997/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 13 000 000 3 000 000 30/11/2000 TONTOLI 43084/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 19 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 TRUOCCHIO 43016/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 13 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 VIGNOGNA 43070/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 13 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 ZEOLI 43109/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 13 000 000 1 000 000 05/12/2000 ZOLLO   43015/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 11 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000 ZULLO   43066/98 22/06/2000, final on 22/09/2000 15 000 000 3 000 000 05/12/2000   [1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 31 October 2007 at the 1007th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies