CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 28 février 2007
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-79862
- Date
- 28 février 2007
- Publication
- 28 février 2007
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleInformation given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the friendly settlement
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold }   Resolution CM/ResDH(2007)24   Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Ahmet Turan Demir against Turkey   (Application N. 72071/01, judgment of 22 December 2005 – Friendly settlement)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the final judgment in this case, transmitted by the Court to the Committee on 22 December   2005;   Recalling that the complaint declared admissible by the Court in this case concerned an allegedly unjustified interference with the applicant's freedom of expression on account of his conviction in 2000 under former Article 8 of the Anti-terrorism Law (No. 3713) following a public speech he made (complaint under Article 10);   Whereas the Court, having taken formal note of a friendly settlement reached by the government of the respondent state and the applicant, and having been satisfied that the settlement was based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided unanimously to strike the case out of its list and took note of the parties' undertaking not to request a re-hearing of the case before the Grand Chamber;   Whereas under the friendly settlement it was agreed that the Government of Turkey would pay the applicant, the global sum of € 5 500, to be converted into Turkish lira at a rate applicable on the date of payment and that, failing which, simple interest at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank plus three percentage points should be payable from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement, within three months as from the notification of the judgment;   Recalling that the Rules of the Court provide that the striking-out of a case which has been declared admissible shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward to the Committee of Ministers once it has become final in order to allow it to supervise, in accordance with Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the execution of any undertakings which may have been attached to the discontinuance, friendly settlement or solution of the matter;   Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that on 21 March 2006, within the time-limit agreed to under the terms of the friendly settlement, the government of the respondent state had paid the applicant the sum agreed in the friendly settlement and that no other measure was required in the present case to comply with the Court's judgment,   Recalling that, as regards the applicant's complaints declared admissible in this case, the Committee of Ministers has been supervising since 1998 the execution of several judgments of the Court (in particular the Inçal judgment of 9 June 1998) finding in particular a violation of Article 10 of the Convention on account of unjustified interferences with freedom of expression;   Whereas, in this connection, the Turkish authorities informed the Committee of Ministers that they were drafting and adopting new individual and general measures in order to fully remedy the consequences for the applicants of the violations found and to prevent new violations similar to those already found in these cases (see Interim Resolutions ResDH(2001)106 and ResDH(2004)38),   Declares, having examined the information supplied by the Government of Turkey, that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention with respect to the commitments subscribed to in this case  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 28 février 2007
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-79862
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral