CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 16 janvier 1987
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-55438
- Date
- 16 janvier 1987
- Publication
- 16 janvier 1987
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleInformation given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment.
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 54 (art. 54) of the   Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the convention"),   Having regard to the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the Bönisch case, delivered on 6 May 1985 and 2 June 1986 and transmitted the same days to the Committee of Ministers;   Recalling that the case had its origin in an application against Austria lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights under Article 25 (art. 25) of the convention by a German national, Mr. Helmut Bönisch, alleging inter alia that the proceedings taken against him had violated two provisions of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), in that they had not provided a fair trial and paragraph 3.d (art. 6-3-d), by reason of the inequality of treatment between the Federal Food Control Institute's expert and the defence's expert who had been heard only as a witness;   Recalling that the case had been brought before the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights and by the Government of Austria;   Whereas in its judgment of 6 May 1985 the Court unanimously:   - holds that there has been a breach of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1);   - holds that it is not necessary to examine the applicant's complaint concerning Article 6, paragraph 2 (art. 6-2);   - holds that the question of the application of Article 50 (art. 50) is not ready for decision;   Whereas in its judgment of 2 June 1986 the Court unanimously:   - holds that the respondent state is to pay to the applicant, for damage, seven hundred thousand (700 000) Austrian schillings;   - holds that the respondent state is to reimburse to the applicant, for costs and expenses, three hundred thousand (300 000) schillings, less the one hundred thousand (100 000) schillings already paid by the Government;   Having regard to the "Rules concerning the application of Article 54 (art. 54) of the convention";   Having invited the Government of Austria to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgments, having regard to its obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the convention to abide by the judgments;   Whereas, during the examination of this case by the Committee of Ministers, the Government of Austria informed the Committee of the measures taken in consequence of the judgments, this information being summarised at the appendix to this resolution;   Having satisfied itself that the Government of Austria has awarded the just satisfaction provided for in the judgment of the Court of 2 June 1986,   Declares, after taking note of the information supplied by the Government of Austria, that it has exercised its function under Article 54 (art. 54) of the convention in this case.   Appendix to Resolution DH (87) 1   Information provided by the Government of Austria during the examination of the Bönisch case by the Committee of Ministers   The Austrian Constitutional Court has ruled, in a case involving the same provisions of the Food Code as had been at issue in the Bönisch case, that these provisions are contrary to the Constitution.   The Constitutional Court has invoked the judgment of the European Court of 6 May 1985 in support of its decision.   According to the decision of the Constitutional Court the provisions concerned were abrogated on 21 October 1986.   The sum provided for in the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 2 June 1986 for damage and for costs and expenses have been paid to the applicant.    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 16 janvier 1987
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-55438
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral