CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 25 juin 1996
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-51388
- Date
- 25 juin 1996
- Publication
- 25 juin 1996
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 6-1
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block }   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),     Having regard to the report drawn up on 18 October 1995 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 3 July 1990 by Mr Gert Lagler against Austria (Application No. 16906/90);     Whereas on 24 November 1995 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the case has not been referred to the European Court of Human Rights, either by the Commission or by a state entitled to do so under Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention, within the time-limit of three months from the transmission of the report to the Chairman of the Committee of Minister; considering, however, that within this time-limit, the applicant seized the Court in accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 24 April 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called upon to take a decision in accordance with Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention and with Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention as amended by Article 5 of Protocol No. 9 (P9-5) for those states having ratified the latter;     Whereas in his application, declared admissible by the Commission on 5 April 1995, the applicant complained of the excessive length of certain criminal proceedings;     Whereas in its report the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;     Whereas, at the 567th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 14 June 1996, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention,     Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case;     Decides to pursue the examination of the present case, in accordance with Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention with a view to adopting the final resolution.  Articles de loi cités
Article 6 CEDHArticle 6-1 CEDH
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 25 juin 1996
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-51388
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral