CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 25 juin 1996

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block }    The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),     Having regard to the report drawn up on 29 November 1995 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 11 March 1993 by Mr Michel Felici against Luxembourg (Application No. 21903/93);     Whereas on 19 December 1995 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;     Whereas in his application, as declared admissible by the Commission on 5 April 1995 (final decision as to the admissibility), the applicant complained that the judicial authorities had refused his request to confront prosecution witnesses in the course of criminal proceedings against him at the end of which he was convicted;     Whereas in its report the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion that there had been no violation of Article 6, paragraphs 1 and 3.d (art. 6-1, art. 6-3-d), of the Convention;     Whereas on 14 June 1996, at the 567th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there had not been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraphs 1 and 3.d (art. 6-1, art. 6-3-d), of the Convention,     Declares that it has exercised its functions under Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention in this case;     Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case.