CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 15 novembre 1996

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s4AB489F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:20pt } .sD8D566C3 { height:0pt; text-align:left; display:block; position:absolute; z-index:-1 } .sF60A7932 { margin-top:89.55pt; margin-left:180.8pt; position:absolute } .s4B8D41EE { font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD227234A { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block } .s13F94BDE { font-family:Arial; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .s2EAAAA4F { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify }   RESOLUTION DH (96) 609 HUMAN RIGHTS   APPLICATION No.   26032/94 RAIMONDO ADIUTORE AGAINST ITALY   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 November 1996 at the 576th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article   32 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),   Having regard to the report drawn up on 28 February 1996 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 18   March 1994 by Mr   Adiutore Raimondo against Italy (Application No.   26032/94);   Whereas on 2 April 1996 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article   32, paragraph   1, of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article   48 of the Convention;   Whereas in his application, declared admissible by the Commission on 18   October 1995, the applicant complained of the excessive length of certain civil proceedings before labour courts;   Whereas in its report adopted on 28 February 1996, the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion that there had been no violation of Article   6, paragraph   1, of the Convention;   Whereas at the 576th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, in a decision adopted on 15 November 1996, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1, of the Convention, that there had been in this case no violation of Article 6, paragraph   1, of the Convention,   Declares that it has exercised its functions under Article 32 of the Convention in this case;   Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case.