CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 26 juin 1986
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-49260
- Date
- 26 juin 1986
- Publication
- 26 juin 1986
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 6-1;Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations;Compensation paid
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the convention"),   Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the convention relating to the application lodged by Mr Karl Adler against Switzerland (No. 9486/81);   Whereas on 29 April 1985 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the convention;   Whereas in his application introduced on 7 August 1981 the applicant complained that the public law action for damages brought by him against the Swiss Confederation had been examined in first and last instance by the 1st section of public law of the Swiss Federal Court, without a public hearing, in violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the convention;   Whereas the Commission declared the application admissible on 3 March 1983 and in its report adopted on 15 March 1985 it expressed unanimously the opinion that Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the convention had been violated for the reason that the Federal Court had in first and last instance rejected the applicant's action without a public hearing;   Agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission in accordance with Article 31, paragraph 1 (art. 31-1), of the convention;   Having examined the proposals made by the Commission in accordance with Article 31, paragraph 3 (art. 31-3), of the convention;   Whereas during the examination of this case the Swiss Government informed the Committee of Ministers that the Swiss authorities had already taken general measures designed to remedy the procedural defect found and that in addition they were prepared to take such specific measures as those proposed by the Commission if the Committee of Ministers would decide that there had been a violation of the convention in this case,   Takes note, with satisfaction:   - that the Swiss Federal Court has taken administrative measures so as to prevent similar cases from occurring in the future;   - that, following the decision of the Committee of Ministers under Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the convention, the Swiss Government, having taken into consideration the proposals made by the Commission in accordance with Article 31, paragraph 3 (art. 31-3), of the convention, has paid for compensation to the applicant the sum of 3 000 Swiss Francs;   Voting in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the convention,   a. Decides that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the convention in this case;   b. Decides that no further action is called for in this case.    Articles de loi cités
Article 6 CEDHArticle 6-1 CEDH
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 26 juin 1986
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-49260
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral