CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 11 avril 1985
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-49257
- Date
- 11 avril 1985
- Publication
- 11 avril 1985
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleNo decision (two thirds majority not reached)
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the convention"),   Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the convention and relating to the application lodged by Mr Vilar Dores and Mr Cancio Silveira against Portugal (Nos. 9345/81 and 9346/81);   Whereas on 15 September 1983 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights, in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the convention;   Whereas in their applications introduced on 30 March 1981, the applicants complained that their cases had not been tried by the Industrial Court within "reasonable time" and that there had consequently been a breach of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the convention;   Whereas the Commission, having joined the two applications and having declared them admissible on 6 July 1982, in its report adopted on 6 July 1983 expressed the unanimous opinion that in this case there has been a breach of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the convention;   Having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the convention and having noted that the majority of two-thirds required by Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the convention had not been attained,   Decides that it can take no further action in the case and accordingly removes the examination of the case from its agenda.    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 11 avril 1985
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-49257
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral