CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 2 avril 1981

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }  The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as the "convention"),   Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the convention relating to the application lodged by Mr Alan Stanley Hamer against the United Kingdom (Application No. 7114/75);   Whereas on 11 February 1980 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the convention;   Whereas in his application introduced on 25 May 1975 the applicant complained that he was denied facilities necessary to enable him to marry whilst he was serving a prison sentence, alleging a violation of Article 12 (art. 12) of the convention;   Whereas the Commission, after having declared the application admissible on 13 October 1977, in its report adopted on 13 December 1979 considered that the fact that national law did not allow the applicant to marry in prison and the fact that the Home Secretary would not allow him temporary release so that he could marry elsewhere, amounted to an interference with the exercise of his right to marry, that the imposition of any substantial period of delay in the exercise of this right must in general be seen as an injury to its substance and that the applicant's ability to exercise his right to marry was substantially delayed by the combined effects of national law and administrative action;   Whereas in its report the Commission expressed the unanimous opinion that the applicant's right to marry guaranteed by Article 12 (art. 12) of the convention had been violated;   Agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission in accordance with Article 31, paragraph 1 (art. 31-1), of the convention;   Whereas during the examination of this case the Committee of Ministers was informed by the Government of the United Kingdom that it accepted the Commission's report, that it had changed its practice with regard to the marriage of prisoners, like Mr Hamer, serving a determinate custodial sentence, that a decision had been taken to prepare legislation to amend the marriage laws so as to allow prisoners to be married in prison, that it hoped that there would be an early opportunity to introduce this legislation after the passage of which it intended to allow prisoners' marriages without the restrictions and delays which at present apply;   Voting in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the convention,   a.     Decides that in this case there has been a violation of Article 12 (art. 12) of the convention;   b.     Decides, having regard to the information supplied by the Government of the United Kingdom, that no further action is called for in this case.