CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 11 mars 2026

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s10027FC0 { margin-left:5.4pt; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s2D8BB0A7 { height:12.55pt } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sCEF2C954 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } Interim Resolution CM/ResDH(2026)36 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Cyprus against Turkey   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 March 2026 at the 1553 rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 25781/94 CYPRUS v. TURKEY 10/05/2001 12/05/2014 Grand Chamber   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the fourteen violations of the Convention relating to a number of issues regarding the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August   1974;   Recalling that in its judgment on just satisfaction, of 12 May 2014, the Court held that the respondent State is to pay the applicant government, within three months, EUR 30,000,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage suffered by the relatives of missing persons and EUR 60,000,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage suffered by the enclaved Greek Cypriot residents of the Karpas peninsula; recalling also that the Court indicated that these amounts should be distributed by the applicant government to the individual victims under the supervision of the Committee of Ministers within 18 months of the date of payment or within any other period considered appropriate by the Committee of Ministers;   Recalling also that the deadline for payment expired on 12 August 2014;   Deploring that to date, despite its previous Interim Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)201 and decisions adopted in this case concerning the issue of the payment of the just satisfaction, the Turkish authorities have not complied with their unconditional obligation to pay the amounts awarded by the Court for the damage suffered by the individual victims concerned by this case ;   Noting the comments provided by the Turkish authorities relating to the just satisfaction (documents DH-DD(2026)1 and DH-DD(2026)263);   FIRMLY REITERATED its insistence on Türkiye’s unconditional obligation under Article 46, paragraph   1, of the Convention to pay the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;   DEPLORED that prolonged delays in fulfilling this obligation not only prevent the individual victims from receiving compensation for the damage suffered by them, but is also in flagrant conflict with Türkiye international obligations, both as a High Contracting Party to the Convention and as a member State of the Council of Europe;   EXHORTED the Turkish authorities to abide by this obligation and pay the just satisfaction, together with the default interest accrued, without further delay,   DECIDED TO RESUME CONSIDERATION of this issue at the next examination of the case of Cyprus v. Turkey.