CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG6
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 7 octobre 2025
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-245907
- Date
- 7 octobre 2025
- Publication
- 7 octobre 2025
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 29 April 2024 and 27 October 2025   THIRD SECTION Application no. 42160/21 Robert PAVLOVIĆ against Serbia lodged on 5 August 2021 communicated on 8 April 2024 and 7 October 2025   The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Subject matter of the case and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC. ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Having regard to the States’ positive obligations under Article 8 of the Convention, was the manner in which the criminal- and civil-law mechanisms were applied in the present case by the domestic authorities in breach of that provision (see Remetin v. Croatia , no. 29525/10, §§   68-108, 11 December 2012)?   2.     As regards the fact that, as a matter of law, the prosecutor’s decision to discontinue criminal proceedings against N.I. was not amenable to appeal, did the applicant have an effective remedy for his grievances falling within the scope of Article   8 of the Convention, as required by Article   13 of the Convention?   3.     As regards the incident of 21   July 2016 and the ensuing proceedings, has the applicant suffered discrimination on the ground of his Roma origin, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention and /or Article   1 of Protocol No.   12?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Formation
- 6
- Date
- 7 octobre 2025
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-245907
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral