CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 7 février 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s85646119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:12pt } .sEDC5336B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .sCBC20640 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Published on 24 February 2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 6309/21 Levent KURT against Türkiye and 4 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 7 February 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the allegedly inadequate conditions of the applicants’ detention during prison transfers on the dates indicated in the appendix. The applicants complain under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention about the inhuman and degrading conditions of those transfers and the absence of an effective remedy. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Have the applicants been subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment due to the conditions of transport in a prison van, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention (see, among others, Yakovenko v. Ukraine , no.   15825/06, §§   105 ss., 25 October 2007, and Tomov and Others v.   Russia , nos.   18255/10 and 5 others, §§   117-19, 9   April 2019)?   The Government are requested to provide photos and/or drawings of the transport vans together with data regarding the conditions of transport, in particular:   - Duration of each transfer in question;   - Model of the prison van and the measurements (including the height) of its compartments where the applicants were transported;   - The space (in square metres) available per applicant in the prison van for the journey in question;   - Conditions of ventilation, heating and lighting in those compartments;   - Whether and how many times the applicants were given a restroom break during the journey in question.   2.     Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaints under Article 3, as required by Article 13 of the Convention (see Tomov and Others , cited above, §§ 144-56, and İlerde and Others v. Türkiye , nos. 35614/19 and 10 others, §§   161-65, 5   December 2023)?     APPENDIX No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by Prison transfer in question and specific grievances 1. 6309/21 Kurt v. Türkiye 06/01/2021 Levent KURT 1969 İzmir Turkish   Transfer from Sincan prison to Kayseri prison on 8/10/2018 in an overcrowded van, lasting 3.5 hours, insufficient ventilation and lighting, no restroom break. 2. 38377/21 Likoğlu v. Türkiye 22/06/2021 Fatih LİKOĞLU 1979 Afyonkarahisar Turkish Tahir EREN Transfer from Afyonkarahisar prison to Bafra prison on 8/10/2018 in an overcrowded van, lasting 12 hours, insufficient ventilation, inadequate food, only one break for access to sanitary facilities. 3. 1554/22 Kaya v. Türkiye 10/12/2021 Abdulhadi KAYA 1969 Adana Turkish Ayşenur Banu PEHLİVAN Transfer from Adana prison to Kayseri prison on 18/12/2018 in an overcrowded van, lasting 4.5 hours, insufficient ventilation and light, no restroom break. 4. 14546/24 Orhan v. Türkiye 08/05/2024 Yalçın ORHAN 1967 İzmir Turkish Mustafa ORHAN Transfer from Sakran prison to Bolvadin prison on 26/02/2021 in an overcrowded van lasting 6 hours, no restroom break. 5. 15255/24 Okur v. Türkiye 20/05/2024 Bülent OKUR 1978 İzmir Turkish   Transfer from Izmir prison to Bolvadin prison on 21/02/2021 in an overcrowded van lasting 7 hours, insufficient ventilation and light; no restroom break.