CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 13 janvier 2025
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-241868
- Date
- 13 janvier 2025
- Publication
- 13 janvier 2025
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s6C3B0BAF { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:28.35pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sC7F8CD85 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sAC521AF { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s304E8EB8 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } Published on 3 February 2025   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 30134/17 Oleksiy Oleksandrovych PADALKA against Ukraine and 2 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 13 January 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The applications concern allegations of ill-treatment by law-enforcement authorities and the lack of effective domestic investigation in respect of these allegations. The applicants rely on Articles   3, 6 and 13 of the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Have the applicants been subjected to torture, inhuman or degrading treatment, in breach of Article   3 of the Convention?   2.     Having regard to the procedural protection from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment (see Labita v.   Italy [GC], no.   26772/95, 131, ECHR   2000-IV and Kaverzin v. Ukraine , no.   23893/03, §§   169-182, 15   May 2012), was the investigation of the applicants’ relevant complaints by the domestic authorities compatible with the requirements of Article   3 of the Convention?     APPENDIX Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Alleged ill-treatment 30134/17 Padalka v.   Ukraine 04/04/2017 Oleksiy Oleksandrovych PADALKA 1992 Lebedyn 04-11/08/2012 Officers of the Lebedyn municipal police Multiple bruises and abrasions 2544/19 Gorbanenko v. Ukraine 26/12/2018   Mykola Kostyantynovych GORBANENKO 1991 Dnipro 07-10/03/2015 Officers of the Babushkinsyy district police in Dnipro Cranio-cerebral injury, chest and ribs contusion, multiple hematomas and abrasions 7397/19 Kovalskyy v. Ukraine 23/01/2019 Roman Viktorovych KOVALSKYY 1988 Makedony   05-12/11/2008 Officers of the Baryshivka and Berezan police Police officers squeezed the applicant’s genitals having first blind ‑ folded him and having inserted a piece of foam in his mouth to prevent him from screaming; pushed and manhandled him while he was handcuffed; and threatened him with torture with a view to obtaining self ‑ incriminating statements during the period when the applicant was detained for having allegedly committed an administrative offence  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 13 janvier 2025
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-241868
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel