CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 5 décembre 2024

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s9B8A0E71 { padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:11.35pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s66053943 { text-transform:uppercase } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2024)329 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Seven cases against Albania   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 5 December 2024 at the 1514 th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)   Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 10508/02 Gjonboçari and others 23/10/2007 31/03/2008 22122/08 LACEJ AND OTHERS 29/09/2022 29/09/2022 72348/11 MULLA 06/07/2023 06/07/2023 61445/12+ ZEQO AND SEAT SH.P.K. 22/06/2023 22/06/2023 11254/11 hAMITAJ 20/07/2023 20/07/2023 31018/09 VICKTORIA SH.P.K 22/02/2024 22/02/2024 18076/12 VJOLA SH.P.K. AND DE SH.P.K 30/01/2024 30/01/2024   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of excessive length of proceedings and, in Gjonboçari and Others case, also the failure to enforce a final judgment and lack of effective remedies (violations of Articles 6, paragraph   1, and 13);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2024)1210 );   Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that proceedings have ended in the cases Lacej and Others , Mulla , Zeqo and Seat Sh.P.K. , Hamitaj , Vicktoria Sh.P.K ., and Vjola Sh.P.K. and De Sh.P.K already before the European Court’s judgments and the just satisfaction was paid, and for Gjonbocari and Others case an administrative decision has been adopted to implement the relevant domestic court’s judgment and the just satisfaction was also paid;   Recalling in connection with the Gjonbocari and Others case that the relevant general measures required in response to the violation related to the non-enforcement of a court decision by the former Commission on Restitution and Compensation of Properties, were examined in the framework of the Manushaqe Puto group of cases (application No. 604/07), which was closed by Final Resolution ( CM/ResDH(2018)349 );     Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings identified by the Court continues to be supervised under the Luli and Others group of cases, also in the light of the Court’s findings in these cases, and that the closure of this case therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;   Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases;   DECIDES to continue to supervise the adoption of the necessary general measures concerning the excessive length of proceedings in the group of cases Luli and Others ; and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.