CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 5 septembre 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } Published on 30 September 2024   THIRD SECTION Application no.   3729/21 Y.M. against Russia and 5 other applications (see table appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 5 September 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed table, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 3 of the Convention relating to risk of torture in case of removal to the destination country which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Khasanov and Rakhmanov v. Russia [GC], nos. 28492/15 and 49975/15, 29   April 2022, K.I. v. Russia, no. 58182/14, 7 November 2017 and Mamazhonov v. Russia, no. 17239/13, 23 October 2014).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (risk of torture in case of removal to the destination country) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Final removal decision (expulsion or extradition) Destination country Nature of the risk Other relevant information Relevant case-law Other complaints under well ‑ established case ‑ law     3729/21* 24/12/2020   Y.M. 1994   Kirill Zharinov Moscow Moscow City Court, 14 May 2018 Tajikistan   Detention pending expulsion 19/04/2018-15/07/2022 Removed to Tajikistan on 15/07/2022 Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no.   16483/12, §§   89 ‑ 91, 15 December 2016       25969/21* 05/07/2021   S.M. 1991   Daria Vladimirovna Trenina Moscow Moscow Regional Court, 10/06/2021 Tajikistan Religious persecution Removed to Tajikistan on 31/05/2022 despite the interim measure indicated on 08/06/2021. Khasanov and Rakhmanov v.   Russia [GC], nos.   28492/15 and 49975/15, 29 April 2022;   K.I. v. Russia, no.   58182/14, 7 November 2017;   Mamazhonov v.   Russia, no.   17239/13, 23   October 2014       27939/21* 03/06/2021   M.M. 1974   Kirill Zharinov Moscow Kirovskiy District Court of Yekaterinburg, 24/05/2021 Uzbekistan Religious persecution On 27/05/2021 before the removal decision entered into force the applicant was transferred to Uzbekistan. According to his account the removal happened by force and against his will. According to the authorities he was removed at his own request (the tickets were bought by the unknown persons in Uzbekistan and the flight had only 2 passengers on board). The applicant currently serves his sentence in Uzbekistan. On 06/03/2024 he confirmed his wish to pursue the proceedings despite certain previous statements to the contrary (allegedly made under the pressure from the Uzbek authorities). Khasanov and Rakhmanov v.   Russia [GC], nos.   28492/15 and 49975/15, 29 April 2022,   Mamazhonov v.   Russia, no.   17239/13, 23   October 2014       50989/21* 19/10/2021   V.D. 1990   Denis Yuryevich Reva Belgorod First Appellate Court, 21/10/2021 Belarus Political persecution Arrested on 13/04/2021 pending extradition, released from detention on 04/04/2022 Khasanov and Rakhmanov v.   Russia [GC], nos.   28492/15 and 49975/15, 29 April 2022       52017/21* 25/10/2021   R.B. 1969   Kirill Zharinov Moscow Moscow Regional Court, 02/11/2021 Tajikistan Religious and political persecution Removed to Tajikistan on 31/05/2022 despite the interim measure indicated on 02/11/2021. Khasanov and Rakhmanov v.   Russia [GC], nos.   28492/15 and 49975/15, 29 April 2022;   K.I. v. Russia, no.   58182/14, 7 November 2017;   Mamazhonov v.   Russia, no.   17239/13, 23 October 2014       787/22* 06/12/2021   N.T. 1994   Olga Pavlovna Tseytlina St Petersburg Third Cassation Court, 04/02/2021 Kyrgyzstan   Detention pending expulsion 18/02/2020-01/03/2022. Released on 01/03/2022. Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no.   16483/12, §§ 89-91, 15 December 2016 Art. 5 (1) (f) - Lawful arrest / detention/for deportation / expulsion