CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 18 avril 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 2 September 2024   THIRD SECTION   Application no.   23218/17 Yevgeniy Valeryevich DOMOZHIROV and Anatoliy Leonidovich GRYAZNOV against Russia and 6 other applications (see table appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 18 April 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed table, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     23218/17* 20/03/2017 Yevgeniy Valeryevich DOMOZHIROV 1974     Anatoliy Leonidovich GRYAZNOV 1977 Aleksey Vladimirovich Glukhov Novocheboksarsk Rally "825 years of Vologda Park"   Vologda   01/06/2016 Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO (Domozhirov),   Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO (Gryaznov) 40 hours of community works (Domozhirov for Art. 20.2 § 8 CAO),   fine of RUB 10,000 (Gryaznov under Art. 20.2 § 5 CAO) Vologda Regional Court 26/12/2016       55824/21* 05/11/2021 Konstantin Sergeyevich SMIRNOV 1983    Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Krasnoyarsk   31/01/2021 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 13/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to and detention at a police station between 3.00 p.m. and 4.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     7545/22 20/01/2022 Artem Nikolayevich ZAZYKIN 1985    Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Tula   23/01/2021 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Tula Regional Court 20/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest, escorting to and detention at a police station between 2.15 p.m. and 6.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     35062/22 30/05/2022 Maksim Alekseyevich LOGINOV 1986    Aleksey Sergeyevich Lapuzin Samara Anti-war protest   Tolyatti   24/02/2022 Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO detention for 10 days Samara Regional Court 01/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to and detention at a police station on 24-25/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.     48754/22* 14/09/2022 Ramiz Talyb ogly USUBOV 1994    Natalya Andreyevna Baranova Moscow Anti-war protest   Novosibirsk   06/03/2022 Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of   RUB 10,000 Novosibirsk Regional Court 26/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest, escorting to and detention at a police station on 06/03/2022 between 3.40 p.m. and 9.30 p.m.,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     2270/24* 31/12/2023 Tatyana Aleksandrovna GLAZOVA 1987        Anti-war protest   Moscow   13/03/2022 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 31/08/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to and detention at a police station on 13-14/03/2022.     3271/24* 13/01/2024 Svetlana Edgarovna FRIK 1967        Anti-war protest   Moscow   27/02/2022 Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 13/09/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report on 27/02/2022 (the applicant remained there for one hour and twenty minutes).