CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 25 juin 2024
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-235230
- Date
- 25 juin 2024
- Publication
- 25 juin 2024
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB24F5E38 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Published on 15 July 2024   FIRST SECTION Application no. 18543/23 Idris AMIRASLAN against Azerbaijan and 2 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 25 June 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the applicants’ arrests and detentions by police officers for several hours without any documentation when they were participating in peaceful assemblies. Based on these allegations the applicants lodged complaints with the prosecuting authorities which rejected them, finding that the applicants’ arrests and detentions were lawful since they had participated in unauthorised assemblies. The domestic courts also rejected their complaints and upheld the reasoning given by the prosecuting authorities. The applicants complain under Article 5 § 1 and Articles 11 and 13 of the Convention that their rights to liberty and freedom of peaceful assembly were violated and that they had no effective domestic remedy at their disposal.       QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Were the applicants arrested and deprived of their liberty in breach of Article   5 §   1 of the Convention? In particular, did their deprivation of liberty fall within one of the sub-paragraphs of this provision? Were the applicants’ arrests and detentions in accordance with a procedure “prescribed by law”?   2.     Has there been an interference with the applicants’ freedom of peaceful assembly, within the meaning of Article   11 §   1 of the Convention? If so, was this interference prescribed by law and necessary in terms of Article   11 § 2?   3.     Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaints under Article 5 of the Convention concerning their deprivation of liberty by the police, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?   4.     Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaints under Article 11 of the Convention concerning the interference with their right to freedom of peaceful assembly, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?   APPENDIX List of cases:   No. Application no. Lodged on Case name Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1. 18543/23 31/03/2023 Amiraslan v.   Azerbaijan Idris Bayram oglu AMIRASLAN 1986 Baku Azerbaijani Nemat KARIMLI 2. 18790/23 31/03/2023 Mamiyev v.   Azerbaijan Aziz Iltifat oglu MAMIYEV 1993 Salyan Azerbaijani Nemat KARIMLI 3. 31497/23 18/07/2023 Yagublu v.   Azerbaijan Tofig Rashid oglu YAGUBLU 1962 Baku Azerbaijani Nemat KARIMLI  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 25 juin 2024
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-235230
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel