CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 27 mai 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .sD9F4E884 { height:83.95pt } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s286064EC { height:70.2pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sEAD0756B { height:55.95pt } .sAB814627 { height:69.7pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Published on 17 June 2024   SECOND SECTION Application no. 35316/22 Gürkan İSTEKLI against Türkiye and 3 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 27 May 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE All the applications listed below (see appendix) concern criminal convictions of the applicants to prison sentences combined with a measure of suspension of the pronouncement of the judgment on charges of disseminating propaganda in favour of an illegal organisation under Article   7 §   2 of Law no. 3713 and participating in unlawful meetings and demonstrations under Article 28 § 1 of Law no.   2911. Relying on Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention, the applicants complained about their convictions and the subsequent application of a measure of suspension of the pronouncement of the judgment for their acts and statements allegedly related to their use of freedom of expression and freedom of peaceful assembly. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been an interference with the applicants’ right to freedom of expression and/or peaceful assembly within the meaning of Article   10 §   1 and   11 § 1 of the Convention, due to their conviction to prison sentences combined with a measure of suspension of the pronouncement of the judgment? If so, was that interference in accordance with the law and necessary in terms of Article 10 § 2 and/or Article 11   §   2? Was the measure of the suspension of the pronouncement of the judgment imposed on the applicants prescribed by a legal basis defining the scope and modalities of this measure with sufficient clarity to enable the applicants to enjoy the degree of protection required by the rule of law in a democratic society ( Durukan and Birol v. Türkiye , nos. 14879/20 and 13440/21, §§   58 ‑ 68, 3   October 2023)?     APPENDIX No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1. 35316/22 İstekli v. Türkiye 01/07/2022 Gürkan İSTEKLİ 1991 İstanbul Turkish Ayşe ACINIKLI 2. 35451/22 Ay v. Türkiye 01/07/2022 Raziye AY 1990 Istanbul Turkish Ayşe ACINIKLI EROL 3. 37258/22 Kavak v. Türkiye 01/07/2022 Ferhat KAVAK 1991 İstanbul Turkish Ayşe ACINIKLI 4. 38702/22 Okur v. Türkiye 01/07/2022 İdris OKUR 1990 Van Turkish Ayşe ACINIKLI EROL