CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 16 mai 2024
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-234248
- Date
- 16 mai 2024
- Publication
- 16 mai 2024
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 10 June 2024   THIRD SECTION Application no.   10644/20 Vladislav Aleksandrovich BARABANOV against Russia and 5 other applications (see table appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 16 May 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed table, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 10 § 1 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501/07 and 4 others, 26 April 2016 and Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, 7 February 2017).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 10 § 1 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Location Date Purpose of the demonstration Administrative charges Penalty Final domestic decision Date Name of the court Other relevant information Other complaints under well-established case-law     10644/20* 13/02/2020 Vladislav Aleksandrovich BARABANOV 1997 Aleksey Aleksandrovich Matasov Nizhniy Novgorod (i) Moscow, 01/06/2020, Support of I. Azar;       (ii) Moscow, 05/06/2020, Support of I. Azar and other activists. article 20.2 § 8 of CAO, administrative fine of RUB 200,000;     article 20.2 § 8 of CAO, administrative fine of RUB 250,000. (i) 28/10/2020, Moscow City Court;       (ii) 30/10/2020, Moscow City Court. rotation - event classified as assembly post facto;     rotation - event classified as assembly post facto. Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 01/06/2020 (according to the applicant, between 6.30 p.m. and 9.30   p.m.) and 05/06/2020 (according to the applicant, between 7.30 p.m. and 10 p.m.) for compiling an offence report; the administrative offence record in respect of the event on 05/06/2020 was compiled only on 24/06/2020;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers whose written statements secured the applicant’s conviction in relation to his participation in the event on 05/06/2020.     11487/21 31/12/2020 Pavel Anatolyevich STEPANCHENKO 1988     Moscow, 21/02/2020, in front of the Federal Security Service building, Support of political prisoners article 19.3 § 1 of CAO, administrative detention for 10   days 30/06/2020, Moscow City Court (the applicant was served with the final decision on the following day) distance requirement – event classified as assembly post facto Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to and detention at the police station between 21/02/2020 and 22/02/2020 for the sole purpose of drawing up an offence record;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     21235/22* 05/04/2022 Vitaliy Vsevolodovich MANSKIY 1963 Alena Sergeyevna Borisova Moscow Moscow, 22/12/2020, in front of the Federal Security Service building, Protest against A.   Navalnyy’s poisoning article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, administrative fine of RUB 10,000 05/10/2021, Moscow City Court   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers who had arrested the applicant and whose written statements secured his conviction.     30136/22* 28/05/2022 Vadim Igorevich NESTERENKO 2000   Andrey Vasilyevich Sabinin Stavropol Tomsk, Sobornaya Square, 06/03/2022, Solo demonstration against the Russian military attack on Ukraine article 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO, administrative fine of RUB 45,000 29/03/2022, Tomsk Regional Court   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     32871/22 20/06/2022 Kristina Yevgenyevna SHATRYUK 1997   Andrey Vasilyevich Sabinin Stavropol Ilanskiy, 06/03/2022, Solo demonstration against the Russian military attack on Ukraine article 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO, administrative fine of RUB 30,000 13/04/2022, Krasnoyarsk Regional Court   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – arrest and escorting to the police station on 06/03/2022 for compiling an offence report;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     7625/24* 29/02/2024 Konstantin Petrovich FOKIN 1969     Moscow, Red Square, 05/09/2022, Solo demonstration against the Russian military attack on Ukraine article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, administrative fine of RUB 10,000 03/11/2023, Moscow City Court ban on public events at certain locations, namely near the Kremlin (official residency of the President of Russia) Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – arrest, escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.10 p.m. to 11.40 p.m. on 05/09/2022.  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 16 mai 2024
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-234248
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel