CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 4 avril 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } Published on 29 April 2024   THIRD SECTION Application no.   38377/15 Mark Izrailevich GALPERIN and Vladimir Ivanovich IONOV against Russia and 9 other applications (see table appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 4 April 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed table, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     38377/15* 06/07/2015 Mark Izrailevich GALPERIN 1968   Vladimir Ivanovich IONOV 1939   Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Moscow Manifestation in support of Charlie Hebdo (Mr Galperin)   Moscow 10/01/2015   Manifestation in support of Charlie Hebdo (Mr Ionov)   Moscow 10/01/2015   Manifestation in support of political prisoners (Mr   Galperin)   Moscow 21/03/2015   Manifestation in support of political prisoners (Mr Ionov)   Moscow 21/03/2015 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO         article 20.2 § 2 of CAO         article 20.2 § 8 of CAO           article 20.2 § 8 of CAO detention of 8   days         fine of RUB   20,000         fine of RUB   250,000           fine of RUB   150,000 Moscow City Court 27/01/2015         Moscow City Court 26/03/2015         Moscow City Court 14/08/2015           Moscow City Court 24/07/2015 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decisions: Moscow City Court, 27/01/2015, 26/03/2015, 14/08/2015 and 24/07/2015,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 4.15 p.m. on 21/03/2015 to 1 p.m. on 23/03/2015 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - No opportunity to interrogate the police officers on whose written statements the conviction was based; final decisions: Moscow City Court, 14/08/2015 and 24/07/2015     45920/15* 26/08/2015 Mark Izrailevich GALPERIN 1968   Vladimir Ivanovich IONOV 1939   Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Moscow Manifestation in support of political prisoners (Mr   Galperin)   Moscow 06/08/2014   Manifestation in support of political prisoners (Mr Ionov)   Moscow 06/08/2014 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000           fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 18/03/2015           Moscow City Court 26/03/2015 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decisions: Moscow City Court, 18/03/2015 and 26/03/2015,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - No opportunity to interrogate police officers on whose written statements the conviction was based; final decisions: Moscow City Court, 18/03/2015 and 26/03/2015     45925/15* 01/09/2015 Mark Izrailevich GALPERIN 1968   Irina Leonidovna KALMYKOVA 1960   Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Moscow Manifestation in support of political prisoners (Mr   Galperin)   Moscow 06/11/2014   Manifestation in support of political prisoners (Ms   Kalmykova)   Moscow 06/11/2014   Manifestation in support of political prisoners (Ms   Kalmykova)   Moscow 06/05/2015 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000           fine of RUB   20,000           detention of 6   days, cancelled on appeal, released on 08/05/2015 Moscow City Court 18/03/2015           Moscow City Court 08/06/2015           Moscow City Court 08/05/2015 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decisions: Moscow City Court, 18/03/2015, 08/05/2015 and 08/06/2015,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - no opportunity to question the police officers on whose statements the applicant’s conviction was based, final decision: Moscow City Court, 18/03/015, 08/05/2015 and 08/06/2015,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station and detention from 7.15 p.m. on 06/05/2015 to 0.30 a.m. on 07/05/2015 (Mr Galperin). Escorting to the police station and detention from 7 p.m. on 06/05/2015 to 07/05/2015 until court hearing (Ms Kalmykova)     49760/15* 05/09/2015 Vladimir Ivanovich IONOV 1939 Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Moscow Manifestation in support of political prisoners   Moscow 09/06/2014 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 26/03/2015 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 26/03/2015     55234/15* 17/10/2015 Yelena Georgiyevna ZAKHAROVA 1949   Irina Leonidovna KALMYKOVA 1960   Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Moscow Manifestation in support of Navalnyy (Ms Zakharova)   Moscow 15/01/2015   Manifestation in support of Navalnyy (Ms Kalmykova)   Moscow 15/01/2015   Meeting in the memory of Nemtsov (Ms Zakharova)   Moscow 19/04/2015   Meeting in the memory of Nemtsov (Ms Kalmykova)   Moscow 19/04/2015   Meeting in support of small business (Ms   Zakharova)   Moscow 26/05/2015 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO         article 20.2 § 5 of CAO         article 20.2 § 8 of CAO         article 20.2 § 8 of CAO, article 19.3 § 1 of CAO     article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000         fine of RUB   20,000         fine of RUB   150,000         fine of RUB   150,000         fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 04/08/2015         Moscow City Court 08/06/2015         Moscow City Court 24/07/2015           Moscow City Court 12/11/2015         Moscow City Court 26/08/2015 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 15/01/2015 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal on 08/062015 and 04/08/2015 (application form of 17/10/2015 - both applicants);   arrest and detention on 26/05/2015 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal on 26/08/2015 (application form of 26/05/2015, Ms   Zakharova);   arrest and detention on 19/04/2015 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal on 24/07/2015 and 12/11/2015 (application form of 31/12/2015 – both applicants),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decisions: Moscow City Court, 08/06/2015, 24/07/2015, 04/08/2015, 26/08/2015 and 12/11/2015,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based, final decisions: Moscow City Court, 08/06/2015, 24/07/2015, 04/08/2015, 26/08/2015 and 12/11/2015     25139/16* 16/04/2016 Yelena Georgiyevna ZAKHAROVA 1949   Alla Igorevna FROLOVA 1965   Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Moscow Manifestation in support of Savchenko   Moscow 13/11/2015 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 18/12/2015 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 13/11/2015 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 18/12/2015,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - No opportunity to interrogate police officers on whose statements the conviction was based     10336/17* 24/09/2016 Mark Izrailevich GALPERIN 1968 Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Moscow Manifestation against the existing political regime   Moscow 09/01/2016 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB   300,000 Moscow City Court 22/04/2016 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 09/01/2016 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal on 22/04/2016 (raised in application on 24/09/2016);   arrest and detention on 08/12/2016 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record (raised in application on 08/06/2017);   arrest and detention from 14/01/2017 to 16/01/2017 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record (raised in application on 24/06/2017);   no written record of administrative arrest on 07/02/2017 and 09/02/2017 (raised on 05/07/2017),   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport on 14/01/2017 and 16/01/2017, 0.3 sq. m, no access to toilet, food, water,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/04/2016, 20/09/2016 (as regards proceedings relating to disorderly conduct (fight with a passer-by on 15/09/2016) and 23/03/2017 (as regards disobedience to lawful order on 07/02/2017 when the applicant refused to open the door to police officers who wanted to search the apartment (on unspecified case),   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - No opportunity to interrogate the police officers on whose statements the conviction was based; final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/04/2016, 20/09/2016 and 23/03/2017     20784/17* 12/09/2016 Mark Izrailevich GALPERIN 1968   Yelena Georgiyevna ZAKHAROVA 1949   Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Moscow Manifestation against the existing political regime (Mr   Galperin)   Moscow 05/09/2015   Manifestation against the existing political regime   Moscow 05/09/2015 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO           article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB   200,000           fine of RUB   200,000 Moscow City Court 16/03/2016           Moscow City Court 30/03/2016 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 05/09/2015 (Ms Zakharova) and from 05/09/2015 to 07/09/2015 (Mr Galperin) for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decisions: Moscow City Court, 16/03/2016 and 30/03/2016,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - No opportunity to interrogate the police officers on whose written statements the conviction was based     20788/17* 12/09/2016 Irina Leonidovna KALMYKOVA 1960 Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Moscow Manifestation in support of political prisoners   Moscow 06/09/2015 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 30/03/2016 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 06/09/2015 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 30/03/2016,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   79026/17* 09/11/2017 Yuriy Vitalyevich KUCHIN 1967 Konstantin Ilyich Terekhov Moscow Meeting against President Medvedev   Vladivostok 23/03/2017   Manifestation against the existing regime   Vladivostok 01/07/2017 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO         article 20.2 § 8 of CAO RUB   20,000           100 hours of community service Primorye Regional Court 15/05/2017       Primorye Regional Court 25/08/2017 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decisions: Primorye Regional Court, 10/05/2017, 15/05/2017, 02/08/2017 and 25/08/2017,   Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - administrative conviction under article 20.2 para. 2 of CAO for making calls in Facebook to participate in an unauthorised manifestation on 12/06/2017 in Vladivostok, final decision: Primorye Regional Court, 02/08/2017, fine of RUB   20,000,   Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events - administrative conviction for not complaining with restrictions on manifestations, under article 20.2 § 1 of CAO, 26/03/2017, Vladivostok, Primorye Regional Court, 10/05/2017, fine of RUB   20,000