CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 21 mars 2024
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-233396
- Date
- 21 mars 2024
- Publication
- 21 mars 2024
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 15 April 2024   THIRD SECTION Application no.   50365/18 Aleksey Yuryevich LOMAKIN against Russia and 9 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 21 March 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     50365/18* 10/10/2018 Aleksey Yuryevich LOMAKIN 1974   Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Opposition manifestation   Moscow 05/05/2018     Anti-war protest   Moscow 27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO           article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000           fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 28/06/2018         Moscow City Court 19/07/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of the prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings in 2018 and 2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based (in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings),   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 and on 27/02/2022 for compiling an offence report     10530/20 17/02/2020 Artem Aleksandrovich LOSKUTOV 1986     Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Golunov"   Moscow 23/06/2019 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 26/08/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/06/2019 for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based     28840/21* 07/05/2021 Ilmir Rafaelevich SHAKUROV 1986   Regina Ilgizovna Shagiyeva Leninigorsk Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Naberezhnyye Chelny 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 10/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report     7791/22* 25/01/2022 Sergey Fedorovich SAVCHUK 1964     Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 03/08/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to and detention at a police station between 3.30 p.m. and 10.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     8007/22* 31/01/2022 Ilya Roaldovich KRAVCHENKO 1987   Mansur Idrisovich Gilmanov Podolsk Meeting of municipal deputies   Velikiy Novgorod 22/05/2022 article 20.6.1 § 1 CAO fine of RUB   5,000 Novgorod Regional Court 30/07/2021 Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based (1st set of proceedings),   Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - the applicant sentenced to a fine of RUB 1,000 for displaying Nazi symbols (Art.   20.3   CAO), final on 16/09/2021, Volgograd Regional Court (RID Novaya Gazeta and ZAO Novaya Gazeta v.   Russia, no. 44561/11, 11 May 2021, and Karatayev v.   Russia [Committee], no.   56109/07, 13 July 2021),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - two sets of administrative proceedings (1) final decision 16/09/2021, Volgograd Regional Court, fine of RUB 1,000 (2) final decision 30/07/2021, Novgorod Regional Court, fine of RUB 5,000     3706/24* 15/01/2024 Yekaterina Aleksandrovna SUKHORUKOVA 2000   Valentina Andreyevna Chekhova Moscow Anti-war rally   Moscow 28/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 15/09/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to and detention at a police station between 28/02/2022 (8.10 p.m.) and 01/03/2002 (3.05 a.m.)     4069/24 11/01/2024 Mariya Valeryevna SAVCHENKO 1997   Vladimir Sergeyevich Nemanov Moscow Anti-war rally   Moscow 27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 11/09/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to and detention at a police station between 6.15 p.m. and 11.30 p.m. on 27/02/2022     4603/24 05/01/2024 Darya Dmitriyevna RYLOVA 2002   Vladimir Sergeyevich Nemanov Moscow Anti-war rally   Moscow 27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 05/09/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to and detention at a police station between 5.50 p.m. and 11.30 p.m. on 27/02/2022     4698/24 07/01/2024 Marina Aleksandrovna CHERNYKH 1998   Vladimir Sergeyevich Nemanov Moscow Anti-war rally   Moscow 27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 07/09/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to and detention at a police station between 6.15 p.m. and 11.00 p.m. on 27/02/2022   5049/24* 02/02/2024 Vadim Olegovich VERSHINSKIY 1989   Igor Yuryevich Skachko St Petersburg Anti-war rally   Moscow 27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 03/10/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to and detention at a police station between 5.00 p.m. on 27/02/2022 and 1.10 a.m. on 28/02/2022  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 21 mars 2024
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-233396
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel