CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 1 février 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 11 March 2024   THIRD SECTION Application no.   83322/17 Yuriy Aleksandrovich RYBAKIN against Russia and 2 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 15 February 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 3 of the Convention relating to inadequate conditions of detention during transport which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-08, 22 May 2012).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention during transport) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Means of transport Start and end date Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Other complaints under well-established case-law     83322/17* 10/11/2017 Yuriy Aleksandrovich RYBAKIN 1984     van 16/08/2017 to 06/09/2017 0.5 m² single-prisoner cubicle, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, applicant transported on numerous occasions   Art. 8 (1) - permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities - IK-5 Krasnodar Region, detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators, 29/07/2021-17/01/2022,   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities     8120/19* 26/01/2019 Aleksey Sergeyevich CHUBUK 1984 Natalya Andreyevna Balog Krasnoyarsk van, convoy premises of the Sovetskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk 22/12/2016 to 27/07/2018 0.32-0.53 m² single-prisoner cubicle, overcrowding, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, applicant transported on numerous occasions   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport     10982/19* 08/02/2019 Aleksandr Faritovich UMITBAYEV 1955 Tatyana Aleksandrovna Tretyak Gelendzhik van 12/08/2016 to 03/10/2018 0.2 m²   overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to toilet, inadequate temperature, applicant transported on numerous occasions