CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 1 février 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s2A9E4500 { height:31.9pt } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sEB49263B { height:28.2pt } .sF1B14627 { height:64.6pt } .sD024500 { height:36.6pt } .s6CC5F450 { height:127.45pt } .s9845263B { height:20.6pt } .s7E88812A { height:107.1pt } Published on 11 March 2024   THIRD SECTION Application no.   3215/20 Azamat Alvertovich NURLYGAYANOV against Russia and 6 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 15 February 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention relating to permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities which are the subject of well ‑ established case law of the Court (see Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos.   27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention (permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Detention facility Period of detention Specific circumstances Other complaints under well-established case-law     3215/20 27/12/2019 Azamat Alvertovich NURLYGAYANOV 1989     IK-1 Komi Republic pending as of 16/09/2022, since 01/02/2015 opposite-sex operators Art. 3 - inhuman and degrading treatment of "outcast" inmates as a result of segregation, humiliating practices and abuse in their daily life while in detention, heightened risk of inter-prisoner violence (prison hierarchy) - (raised under Articles 3, 8, 14 and 17): The applicant has been serving a prison sentence in IK-1, Komi Republic, since February 2015. He belongs to a group of "outcast" prisoners. As a result, he is allowed to use dishes/cutlery that might be used by other prisoners; he can use toilet/other facilities only when there are no other prisoners; he has no access to the kitchen, he cannot sit by the dining table or use kitchen equipment / utensils/dishes/cutlery. The administration of the colony is aware of the applicant’s situation but takes no action in that respect;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - IK-1, Komi Republic, pending as of 16/09/2022, since 01/02/2015; 1.5 sq. m of personal space, 40 inmates per dormitory, 4 toilets, overcrowding, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities     8980/20 07/10/2020 Viktor Viktorovich OVCHINNIKOV 1991     IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region 09/11/2018 to 12/10/2021 opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities     20334/21* 31/03/2021 Igor Andreyevich SAMARIN 1982     IK-25 Komi Republic pending as of 16/09/2022, since January 2013 opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities,   Prot. 1 Art. 3 - ineligibility to vote in or stand for elections - the applicant was unable to vote in the elections to the State Duma held on 19/09/2021     22060/21* 28/07/2021 Vladimir Ilyich KOLMYKOV 1972     IK-18 Yamalo-Nenetskiy Region,   IK-6 Khabarovsk Region pending as of 16/09/2022, since 08/04/2005 detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities     29139/21* 17/05/2021 Sergey Vladimirovich KHOROSHILOV 1975 Alla Borisovna Yevenko Novokuznetsk IK-6 Khabarovsk Region pending as of 16/09/2022, since 26/08/2019 detention in different cells with video surveillance Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - inadequate conditions of detention in IK-6 Khabarovsk Region since 26/08/2019 - pending as of 16/09/2022 (the applicant is confined to his cell which he shares with another inmate for 22 hours a day; 3   sq.   m of personal space, constant electric light, deterioration in conditions of detention, cumulative effect of lack of physical exercise, lack of contact with the outside world and uncertainty, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack or inadequate furniture, no or restricted access to warm water),   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention after conviction (life imprisonment)     62/22* 22/11/2021 Aleksandr Vasilyevich SASHKOV 1959     IK-6 Khabarovsk Region pending as of 16/09/2022, since 07/10/2017 opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities     22845/23* 25/02/2023 Yuriy Anatolyevich KOZLOV 1964     IZ-1 Syktyvkar, Komi Republic,     IZ-2 Sosnogorsk, Komi Republic from 01/03/2021 to 26/06/2020     from 26/06/2020 to 21/09/2020 detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities,   Art. 3 - torture or inhuman or degrading treatment - The applicant was detained in solitary confinement from May 2012 to 15/09/2020. The domestic courts discerned no violation of the applicant’s rights referring to him being a flight risk and a negative influence the applicant had on other inmates as a leader of a criminal group. The final decision on the matter was taken by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on 27/01/2023