CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 7 février 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 26 February 2024   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 2852/24 Khaled MIARI against Denmark lodged on 26 January 2024 communicated on 7 February 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant is a stateless person of   Palestinian   origin who was born in 1972. He entered Denmark when he was 13   years old. By a High Court judgment, which became final on 29 September 2023, the applicant was convicted of drug offences. He was sentenced to 3 years’ imprisonment and expelled from Denmark with a re-entry ban for 6 years. The applicant complained that the order expelling him from Denmark was in violation of Article 8 of the Convention. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Having regard, in particular, to the fact that the applicant had resided legally in Denmark for 34 years, and was sentenced to 3 years’ imprisonment, would the order to expel him from the country, with a 6-year re-entry ban, be in breach of Article 8 of the Convention (see, for example, Abdi v.   Denmark , no.   41643/19, 14 September 2021, and Sharifi v. Denmark , no.   31434/21, 5   September 2023)?