CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 7 février 2024
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-231509
- Date
- 7 février 2024
- Publication
- 7 février 2024
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sEAE3FFDB { margin-top:24pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sF9195E13 { margin-top:24pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s295DC12A { margin-top:24pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .sAC521AF { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sD8E76205 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s8EB5F569 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super } .sB217F557 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:2pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } Published on 26 February 2024 THIRD SECTION Application no. 2212/20 Stoyan Gerasimov Vasilev and Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror against Bulgaria and 9 other applications (see appended list) communicated on 7 February 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES 1.     These ten applications concern ten refusals of the Bulgarian Registry Agency, dating from the period between June 2019 and July 2023, to enter four associations – Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror (seven refusals), Civil Initiative for the Recognition of a Macedonian National Minority in Bulgaria (one refusal), Macedonian Club for Ethnic Tolerance in Bulgaria (one refusal) and Macedonian Cultural Club Nikola Vaptsarov-Blagoevgrad (one refusal) – in the register of non-profit organisations kept by that Agency. By section 6(1) of the Bulgarian Non-Profit Legal Persons Act 2000, such registration is a prerequisite for a non-profit organisation to acquire legal personality. 2.     All of those four associations advocate the view that there exists an oppressed Macedonian minority in Bulgaria and seek to protect its rights. 3.     The chairpersons of the respective associations sought judicial review of each of the ten refusals, but the competent courts upheld all of them. In all ten cases, the final court of appeal was the Sofia Court of Appeal. In some cases, it pointed to formal deficiencies in the respective association’s registration documents. In other cases, the court stated that the respective association’s aims, as set out in its articles of association, implied that there existed an oppressed Macedonian ethnic minority in Bulgaria, and held that the creation of an association having such aims was directed against the unity of the nation and was meant to stir up ethnic hatred, contrary to the prohibition in Article 44 § 2 of the Bulgarian Constitution. In one case, the court found that the realisation of those aims would result in discrimination against all people who did not share the purported ethnic identity of the association’s founders. In several cases, the court also held that the association’s aims, as set out in its articles of association, were political, whereas by Article 12 § 2 of the Constitution associations could not pursue political aims or carry out political activities. 4.     In eight applications (nos. 2212/20, 32539/20, 38209/21, 38218/21, 10224/22, 22314/23, 34564/23 and 41052/23), the associations and their respective chairpersons complain under Article 11 of the Convention of the respective refusals to register the associations. 5.     In each of the ten applications, they also complain under Article 14 of the Convention taken together with Article 11 of the Convention that those refusals were motivated – some implicitly and some overtly – by the Macedonian ethnic identity of the respective association’s founders. 6.     In one application (no. 41052/23), they further complain under Article   18 of the Convention that the real reason for the one of the refusals to register the association – which the Sofia Court of Appeal upheld on the basis that there were formal deficiencies in the registration documents – was to deny the Macedonian ethnic identity of its founders. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Has there been a breach of the applicants’ right to freedom of association, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention? In particular, were the ten refusals to register the four associations “prescribed by law” and “necessary in a democratic society” for the attainment of one or more of the aims set out in Article 11 § 2, in the light of, in particular, the reasons given to uphold those refusals by the final court of appeal hearing the legal challenges against them – the Sofia Court of Appeal (see, mutatis mutandis ,   United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria (no.   2) , nos. 41561/07 and 20972/08, § 80, 18 October 2011)? 2.     Did the refusal to register Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror at issue in application no.   41052/23 pursue a purpose other than those envisaged by Article 11 of the Convention, contrary to Article 18 of the Convention? APPENDIX No. App. no. Case name Lodged on Applicant and year of birth (where applicable) Represented by 1. 2212/20 Vasilev and Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror v. Bulgaria 23 December 2019 Mr Stoyan Gerasimov VASILEV, 1948 [1] Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror Mr K. Kanev 2. 32539/20 Vasilev and Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror v. Bulgaria 27 July 2020 Mr Stoyan Gerasimov VASILEV, 1948 1 Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror Mr K. Kanev 3. 37103/20 Petkov and Civil Initiative for the Recognition of a Macedonian National Minority in Bulgaria v. Bulgaria 20 August 2020 Mr Yane Petkov PETKOV, 1954 Civil Initiative for the Recognition of a Macedonian National Minority in Bulgaria Mr K. Kanev 4. 38209/21 Vasilev and Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror v. Bulgaria 14 June 2021 Mr Stoyan Gerasimov VASILEV, 1948 1 Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror Mr K. Kanev 5. 38218/21 Radonov and Macedonian Club for Ethnic Tolerance in Bulgaria v. Bulgaria 19 July 2021 Mr Angel Kirilov RADONOV, 1954 Macedonian Club for Ethnic Tolerance in Bulgaria Mr K. Kanev 6. 10224/22 Vasilev and Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror v. Bulgaria 14 February 2022 Mr Stoyan Gerasimov VASILEV, 1948 1 Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror Mr K. Kanev 7. 36931/22 Vasilev and Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror v. Bulgaria 25 July 2022 Mr Stoyan Gerasimov VASILEV, 1948 1 Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror Mr K. Kanev 8. 22314/23 Vasilev and Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror v. Bulgaria 29 May 2023 Mr Stoyan Gerasimov VASILEV, 1948 1 Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror Mr K. Kanev 9. 34564/23 Macedonian Cultural Club Nikola Vaptsarov-Blagoevgrad and Maznev v. Bulgaria 7 September 2023 Macedonian Cultural Club Nikola Vaptsarov-Blagoevgrad Mr Atanas Mihaylov MAZNEV, 1944 Mr K. Kanev 10. 41052/23 Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror and Vasilev v. Bulgaria 15 November 2023 Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror Mr Stoyan Gerasimov VASILEV, 1948 1 Mr K. Kanev   [1]     Mr Vasilev says that he is a national of both Bulgaria and North Macedonia.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 7 février 2024
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-231509
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel