CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 11 janvier 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } Published on 5 February 2024   FOURTH SECTION Application no.   719/19 Aleksandr Maksimovich YERSHOV against Russia and 7 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 11 January 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention relating to lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Karelin v.   Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Penalty Date of final domestic decision Name of court Other complaints under well-established case-law     719/19* 06/12/2018 Aleksandr Maksimovich YERSHOV 1997   Aleksey Borisovich Vologin Volsk fine of RUB   30,000, suspension of driving licence for   1 year and 7 months 29/11/2018 Pugachevskiy District Court of the Saratov Region       60673/19* 01/11/2019 Aleksandr Vasilyevich ABLAKATOV 1992       Detention   for 8 days,       detention   for 8 days 22/09/2019 Cherepovets Town Court of Vologda Region,   22/09/2019 Cherepovets Town Court of Vologda Region   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Art. 6 (3) (c) - own choice of legal assistance - The applicant claims that his representative was not duly informed of the hearings of the appellate courts and thus could not represent his interests at the hearing. The applicant was absent from the proceedings as he was serving an administrative detention. No other representative was appointed for the applicant, despite his requests.     61311/19* 15/11/2019 Sergey Aleksandrovich ROZHKOV 1979   Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Klepikov Chelyabinsk fine of RUB 500,000 21/08/2019 Chelyabinsk Regional Court       6918/21* 10/01/2021 Rada Ravilyevna KARAMOVA 1970   Aleksandr Vasilyevich Popkov Sochi detention for 3 days,   fine of   RUB 700 16/07/2020 Krasnodar Regional Court   15/07/2020 Krasnodar Regional Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – (1) escorting to the police station on 21/04/2020 for compiling an offence report, detention between 21 and 23/04/2020,   (2) escorting to the police station on 11/05/2020 for compiling an offence report and detention between 11and 12/05/2020;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the administrative detention ordered by the court decision of 12/05/2020 was enforced immediately after the decision of the first-instance court.     7286/21* 29/12/2020 Rafael Nurgaliyevich MUSTAKIMOV 1971   Vyacheslav Ilyich GIMADI 1985   Ivan Dmitriyevich KONOVALOV 1995   Anastasiya Sergeyevna VASILYEVA 1984 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius fine of   RUB 5,000 in respect of each applicant 10/07/2020   (in respect of Mustakimov, Gimadi and Konovalov) and 05/08/2020 (in respect of applicant Vasilyeva), Novgorod Regional Court       30338/21* 11/05/2021 Yelena Gennadyevna GRECHISHNIKOVA 1994   Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Mytishchi detention for 5 days 09/02/2021 Moscow City Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 2/02/2021 for compiling an offence report, detention beyond the three-hour statutory period,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     54817/21* 29/10/2021 Darya Dmitriyevna LEVKINA 1998   Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius detention   for 7 days 06/05/2021 Kurgan Regional Court       46461/22* 15/09/2022 Yuliya Anatolyevna LAZAREVA 1995   Vyacheslav Vasilyevich Savin Stavropol detention   for 6 days 22/06/2022   Stavropol Regional Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 11.45 p.m. on 07/05/2022 until the morning of 08/05/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based.,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (c) - unfair criminal proceedings due to lack of legal representation - no access to a lawyer during the proceedings before the first-instance court.