CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 11 janvier 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s4DED3943 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:1pt } Published on 5 February 2024   FOURTH SECTION Application no.   48403/18 Mikhail Sergeyevich FAYZRAKHMANOV against Russia and 11 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 11 January 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention relating to lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Karelin v.   Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Penalty Date of final domestic decision Name of court Other complaints under well-established case-law     48403/18* 05/10/2018 Mikhail Sergeyevich FAYZRAKHMANOV 1995   Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius fine of RUB   10,000 07/05/2018, Zabaykalye Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - calls on the internet (Vkontakte social network) to participate in "Strike of electors" (2018 Presidential elections), conviction under article 20.2 § 1 of the CAO to an administrative fine of RUB 10,000; final decision: Zabaykalye Regional Court, 07/05/2018,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - right to question police officers as witnesses.     23626/21 17/04/2021 Tatyana Viktorovna PUSHKINA 1992   Aleksandr Dmitriyevich Peredruk St Petersburg fine of RUB   20,000 29/10/2020, Novosibirsk Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - calls on the internet (Telegram messenger) to participate in solo picketing in support of the Khabarovsk Region Governor, Mr   S.   Furgal; conviction under article 20.2 §   2 of the CAO to an administrative fine of RUB 20,000; final decision Novosibirsk Regional Court, 29/10/2020,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - right to question police officers as witnesses.     40304/21* 30/07/2021 Sofya Sergeyevna LOPATINA 1997   Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius administrative detention for 8   days,   administrative detention for 10   days,     administrative detention for 30 days 03/02/2021, Kurgan Regional Court (under art. 20.2 § 2)   06/05/2021, Kurgan Regional Court (under art. 19.3 § 1)   06/05/2021, Kurgan regional Court (under art. 20.2 § 8) Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - calls on the internet (Vkontakte social network) to participate in a rally in support of Mr   A.   Navalnyy, on 23/01/2021; conviction under art. 20.2 § 2 of the CAO to 8 days of administrative detention; final decision Kurgan Regional Court, 03/02/2021     41578/21* 03/08/2021 Kseniya Vladislavovna FADEYEVA 1992   Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius fine of RUB   25,000 12/02/2021, Tomsk Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - calls on the internet (Vkontakte social network) to participate in an unauthorised rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy on 23/01/2021; conviction under article 20.2 § 2 of the CAO to an administrative fine of RUB 25,000; final decision: Tomsk Regional Court, 12/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - right to question police officers as witnesses.       42544/21 27/07/2021 Sergey Vladimirovich SERGEYEV 1988   Aleksey Vladimirovich Glukhov Novocheboksarsk administrative detention of 7   days 28/01/2021, Ulyanovsk Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - repost of a call for participation in a rally in Ulyanovsk in support of Mr A. Navalnyy, on the internet (Vkontakte social network); conviction under article 20.2 § 2 of the CAO to administrative detention of 7 days; final decision: Ulyanovsk Regional Court, 28/01/2021, Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.     42738/21* 12/08/2021 Kirill Viktorovich UKRAINTSEV 1990   Veronika Valeryevna Polyakova Moscow administrative detention of 5   days 12/02/2021,   Moscow City Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - repost of a call on the internet (Vkontakte social network) for participation in a demonstration near a district court in Moscow on 11/01/2021; conviction under article 20.2 § 2 of the CAO to administrative detention of 5 days; final decision: Moscow City Court, 12/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - right to question police officers as witnesses.     43689/21* 17/08/2021 Anastasiya Viktorovna GLEBOVA 1994   Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius fine of RUB   25,000 11/03/2021, Vologda Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - calls (distribution of leaflets) to participate in manifestation in support of Navalnyy in Cherepovets on 23/01/2021; conviction under article 20.2 § 2 of the CAO to administrative fine of RUB 25,000; final decision: Vologda Regional Court, 11/03/2021.     46739/21* 10/09/2021 Viktoriya Valeryevna POSTNIKOVA 1975   Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius fine of RUB   5,000 19/03/2021,   Supreme Court of the Skha-Yakutia Republic Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - calls on the internet (Telegram messenger) to participate in unauthorised public event (in a form of a dance in the central square of the town) in support of Mr A. Navalnyy; conviction under article 20.2.2 § 1 of the CAO (with reference to COVID pandemic situation) to an administrative fine of RUB 5,000; final decision: by the Supreme Court of the Skha-Yakutia Republic, 19/03/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to question police officers as witnesses.     54892/21 12/10/2021 Sergey Dmitriyevich BELIKOV 1987   Ernest Aleksandrovich Mezak Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou fine of RUB   10,000 14/04/2021, Supreme Court of the Komi Republic Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - calls on the internet (Vkontakte social network) to participate in an unauthorised rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy on 23/01/2021; conviction under article 20.2 § 2 of the CAO to an administrative fine of RUB 10,000; final decision: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 14/04/2021.   6129/22 06/01/2022 Vladimir Mikhaylovich KOTOV 1990   Ernest Aleksandrovich Mezak Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou fine of RUB   20,000 08/07/2021, Arkhangelsk Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - calls on the internet (Vkontakte social network) to participate in an unauthorised rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy on 21/04/2021; conviction under article 20.2 § 2 of the CAO to an administrative fine of RUB 20,000; final decision: Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 08/07/2021.   14411/22 10/03/2022 Denis Igorevich SHENDEROVICH 1977   Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo Barnaul fine of RUB   25,000 27/10/2021, Moscow City Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - calls on the internet (Instagram social network) to participate in an unauthorised rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy on 23/01/2021; conviction under article 20.2 § 2 of the CAO to an administrative fine of RUB 25,000; final decision: Moscow City Court, 27/10/2021, Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to question police officers as witnesses.   25798/22* 11/05/2022 Anna Stanislavovna DULEVSKAYA 1991   Varvara Dmitriyevna Mikhaylova St Petersburg fine of RUB   20,000 15/11/2021, Moscow City Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - calls on the internet (Facebook) to participate in an unauthorised rally on 21/04/2021 in support of Mr A. Navalnyy; conviction under article 20.2 § 2 of the CAO to an administrative fine of RUB 20,000; final decision: Moscow City Court, 15/11/2021.