CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 30 novembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3050089D { height:83.2pt } .s767C4627 { height:60.1pt } .s86CC2762 { height:96.6pt } Published on 8 January 2024   SECOND SECTION Application no.   24147/21 Aleksey Maksimovich KOMPANIYETS against Russia and 24 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 30 November 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     24147/21 16/04/2021 Aleksey Maksimovich KOMPANIYETS 1992   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 12   days Moscow City Court 08/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 3.02 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 5.30 p.m. on 01/02/2021 until the court hearing for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, on 08/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO     31707/21 07/06/2021 Aleksey Nikolayevich RODIONOV 1991   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 15   days Moscow City Court 09/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 11.05 a.m. on 02/02/2021 to 3 p.m. on 03/02/2021 until the court hearing for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 09/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based; denial of opportunity to adduce evidence in support of the applicant’s account of events (video records of his arrest),   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO     45313/21 23/08/2021 Tatyana Viktorovna SITNICHKINA 1999 Aleksey Vladimirovich Glukhov Novocheboksarsk Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Cheboksary   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 19/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic, 19/03/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based     45320/21 23/08/2021 Anastasiya Ruslanovna ANDRIYANOVA 2000 Aleksey Vladimirovich Glukhov Novocheboksarsk Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Cheboksary   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 23/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic, 23/03/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based     45335/21 23/08/2021 Olga Arkadyevna KHRASTINOVA 1990 Aleksey Vladimirovich Glukhov Novocheboksarsk Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Cheboksary   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 30/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic, 30/03/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based     45336/21 30/08/2021 Mariya Aleksandrovna ZAGVOZKINA 1998 Vladimir Valeryevich Vasin Krasnoyarsk Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Krasnoyarsk   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 03/06/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 03/06/2021     45339/21 30/08/2021 Aleksandra Andreyevna POLEZHAYEVA 1993 Vladimir Valeryevich Vasin Krasnoyarsk Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Krasnoyarsk   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 20/05/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 20/05/2021     45344/21 30/08/2021 Semen Vitalyevich GUSAROV 2001 Vladimir Valeryevich Vasin Krasnoyarsk Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Krasnoyarsk   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 03/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 3 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 4.30 p.m. on 25/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based     45375/21* 12/08/2021 Marat Anasovich KAMALOV 1968 Regina Ilgizovna Shagiyeva Leninigorsk Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Naberezhnyye Chelny   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 26/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful pre-trial detention - arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 and 22/03/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record; escorting to the police station on 03/02/2021 without compiling any reports; arrest and escorting to the Naberezhnyye Chelny City Court on 19/04/2021; raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   53283/21* 09/10/2021 Artem Andreyevich GAVRILOV 1989 Aleksandr Vasilyevich Savin Stavropol Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Stavropol   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Stavropol Regional Court 08/09/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Stavropol Regional Court, 08/09/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   1426/22* 30/12/2021 Nikita Nilolayevich KATAYEV 1985 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Perm   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Perm Regional Court 12/07/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Perm Regional Court, 12/07/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   14670/22* 26/02/2022 Aleksandr Viktorovich TISHCHENKO 1993     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Voronezh   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Voronezh Regional Court 31/08/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 4 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 12 a.m. on 24/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Voronezh Regional Court, 31/08/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   17064/22 05/03/2022 Anastasiya Anatolyevna YURCHENKO 1978 Vyacheslav Sergeyevich Ivanets Tbilisi, Georgia Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Usolye-Sibirskoye   20/11/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Irkutsk Regional Court 08/02/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Irkutsk Regional Court, 08/02/2022   23615/22* 28/03/2022 Artem Viktorovich RYABOV 1992   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Meeting with an MP   Moscow   25/09/2021     article 19.3 § 1 of CAO     article 20.2 § 5 of CAO detention for 7   days     fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 29/09/2021   Moscow City Court 01/02/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 4.30 p.m. on 25/09/2021 to 2.15 p.m. on 27/09/2021 until court hearing for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decisions: Moscow City Court, 29/09/2021 and 01/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based and to adduce the evidence in both sets of proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO,   Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - Overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO)   24677/22* 06/08/2021 Maksim Sergeyevich DOROSHENKO 1996   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 7   days Moscow City Court 13/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 1.55 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 5 p.m. on 01/02/2022 until court hearing for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Moscow City Court, 13/05/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   24684/22* 06/08/2021 Dmitriy Romanovich YEPISHIN 1998 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 7   days Moscow City Court 26/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 4.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 12 p.m. on 01/02/2021 until court hearing for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 26/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   24699/22* 06/08/2021 Aleksey Aleksandrovich KAYGORODTSEV 1993   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 7   days Moscow City Court 26/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 2.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 5.40 p.m. on 01/02/2021 until court hearing for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Moscow City Court, 26/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   36204/22 04/07/2022 Olga Vadimovna MELNIKOVA 1991 Olga Vladimirovna Sirinova St Petersburg Anti-war protest   St Petersburg   15/02/2022 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 St Petersburg City Court 05/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 8.30 p.m. on 24/02/2022 to 5.57 p.m. on 25/02/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 05/05/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   37271/22* 06/07/2022 Pavel Valeryevich YAKOVLEV 1984 Natalya Andreyevna Baranova Moscow Anti-war protest   St Petersburg   03/03/2022 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 5   days St Petersburg City Court 14/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 7.53 p.m. on 03/03/2022 to 12 p.m. on 04/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: St   Petersburg City Court,14/04/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   40249/22* 30/07/2022 Mikhail Vladimirovich KAZAKOV 2000 Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova Nizhniy Novgorod Anti-war protest   Nizhniy Novgorod   24/02/2022 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 18/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 7.40 p.m. on 24/02/2022 to 6.20 p.m. on 25/02/2022 until court hearing for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 18/05/2022   41422/22 13/08/2022 Pavel Vladimirovich LAPIN 1997 Mariya Sergeyevna Zyryanova St Petersburg Anti-war protest   St Petersburg   24/02/2022 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 5   days St Petersburg City Court 14/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 24/02/2022 to 25/02/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 14/04/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   41720/22* 12/08/2022 Ilya Anatolyevich KORKISHKO 1997 Natalya Andreyevna Baranova Moscow Anti-war protest   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 5.26 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 3.14 p.m. on 07/03/2022 until court hearing for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - St Petersburg City Court, 12/04/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   47539/22* 16/09/2022 Natalya Nikolayevna YERMOLINA-LUGOVSKAYA 1972     Anti-war protest   Samara   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Samara Regional Court 09/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 2.30 p.m. to 9.25   p.m. on 06/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Samara Regional Court, 09/06/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   48595/22* 25/09/2022 Guliya Faridovna MUKHAMETZYANOVA 1993 Rim Faridovich Sabirov Kazan Anti-war protest   Kazan   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 25/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 06/03/2022 to 07/03/2022 until court hearing for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic, 25/05/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   50135/22 14/10/2022 Anastasiya Andreyevna IBASHYAN 2003 Varvara Dmitriyevna Mikhaylova St Petersburg Anti-war protest   Moscow   28/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 11/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 28/02/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 11/07/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based