CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 2 novembre 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 27 November 2023   FIFTH SECTION Application no.   45295/21 Nikolay Pavlovich PARFENOV against Russia and 25 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 2 November 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     45295/21 23/08/2021 Nikolay Pavlovich PARFENOV 1951 Andrey Vasilyevich Sabinin Stavropol Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Stavropol   31/01/2021   Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Stavropol   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO Fine of RUB   15,000           detention for 12 days Stavropol Regional Court 07/04/2021         Stavropol Regional Court 16/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report on 31/01/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect for the purposes of compiling an offence record: no written record of the administrative arrest (Art.   27.2 § 3 CAO) (see Timishev v. Russia [Committee], no. 47598/08, § 21, 28 November 2017);   escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report on 21/04/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings (proceedings ended on 07/04/2021 and on 16/06/2021),   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial police officers on whose written statements the conviction was based (proceedings ended on 07/04/2021 and on 16/06/2021),   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the trial court (proceedings ended on 16/06/2021) was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.     45494/21 30/08/2021 Nadezhda Viktorovna GRUBENKO 1991 Vladimir Valeryevich Vasin Krasnoyarsk Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Krasnoyarsk   31/01/2021   Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Krasnoyarsk   21/04/2021     article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   10,000           Fine of RUB   15,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 20/05/2021         Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 05/08/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings (proceedings ended on 20/05/2021 and 05/08/2021)     14623/23* 25/03/2023 Liliya Azatovna GAYFULLINA 2003     Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 25/11/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.27 p.m. until 8.28 p.m. on 06/03/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019)     14626/23* 21/03/2023 Liliya Viktorovna KALAYEVA 1989     Gathering in memory of Boris Nemstov   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 21/11/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 10.00 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 3.30 a.m. on 28/02/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment of “exceptional circumstances” under Art.   27.3 § 1 CAO (see Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-64, 13 February 2018; Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018)     15120/23* 29/03/2023 Artur Vladimirovich OGANESOV 1998     Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 13/12/2022 Art. 8 (2) - restrictions on the right to private life of participants in public assemblies - use of facial recognition technology for the identification of the applicant as a participant of a rally and his subsequent conviction (raised on appeal)     16923/23* 03/04/2023 Stepan Vladimirovich FARAFONOV 1999 Aleksey Mikhaylovich Kuroptev Balashikha Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 05/12/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.50 p.m. until 9.20 p.m. on 06/03/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018)     17444/23* 30/03/2023 Matvey Vladimirovich KOZLOVSKIY 1981     Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   02/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 01/12/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8.05 p.m. on 02/03/2022 until 4.00 a.m. on 03/03/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018)     17733/23* 13/04/2023 Svetlana Aleksandrovna DOROZHKINA 1975     Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 13/12/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.45 p.m. until 8.00 p.m. on 06/03/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect for the purposes of compiling an offence record: no written record of the administrative escort (Art. 27.2 § 3 CAO) (see Timishev v.   Russia [Committee], no. 47598/08, § 21, 28 November 2017), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018)     17877/23* 18/04/2023 Maksim Vadimovich KOLESNIKOV 2001 Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo Barnaul Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 25/01/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.40 p.m. until 11.00 p.m. on 24/02/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019) ,   25420/23* 01/06/2023 Anton Viktorovich BONDAREV 1986 Oleg Vladimirovich Filatchev Moscow Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 01/02/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 06/03/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019)   25571/23* 02/06/2023 Denis Yevgenyevich DEGTYAREV 1983 Valeriya Aleksandrovna Arshinova Moscow Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO Fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 13/02/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.00 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 9.00 a.m. on 07/03/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018)   25573/23* 09/06/2023 Dmitriy Igorevich LOGINOV 1997     Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   26/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 09/02/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5.33 p.m. on 26/02/2022 until 1.00 a.m. on 27/02/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018)   25636/23* 29/05/2023 Dmitriy Sergeyevich SHANGIN 1991     Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 31/01/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. until 9.12 p.m. on 06/03/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §   34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018)   25638/23* 24/05/2023 Olga Sergeyevna MALYKH 1987     Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 24/01/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8.55 p.m. on 24/02/2022 until 3.25 a.m. on 25/02/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect for the purposes of compiling an offence record: no written record of the administrative escort (Art. 27.2 § 3 CAO) (see Timishev v.   Russia [Committee], no. 47598/08, § 21, 28 November 2017)   25701/23* 31/05/2023 Anton Aleksandrovich GNATYUK 1989     Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   26/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 30/01/2023 (received on the following day) Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. on 26/02/2022 until 12.00 p.m. on 27/02/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018)   25725/23* 19/06/2023 Andrey Yevgenyevich FILATOV 1996 Anastasiya Orestovna Samorukova Moscow Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 27/02/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. until 8.35 p.m. on 06/03/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: no written record of the administrative arrest (Art. 27.4 CAO) (see Timishev v. Russia [Committee], no. 47598/08, § 21, 28 November 2017)   25810/23* 15/06/2023 Sarang Vladimirovna TSEBEKOVA 1961     Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 15/02/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.00 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 5.00 a.m. on 07/03/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018)   26029/23* 16/06/2023 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich ZAYTSEV 1992     Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   26/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 16/02/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5.30 p.m. on 26/02/2022 until 12.10 a.m. on 27/02/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018)   26243/23* 30/05/2023 Vladimir Nikolayevich BULAVKIN 1986     Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 30/01/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.45 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 5.00 a.m. on 07/03/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018)   26245/23* 13/06/2023 Aleksandr Sergeyevich NOVOZHILOV 1998     Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   13/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 01/03/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. until 9.20 p.m. on 13/03/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018)   26451/23* 30/05/2021 Yelizaveta Alekseyevna LYGINA 1998 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   02/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 30/01/2023     26455/23* 30/05/2023 Yekaterina Vladimirovna MALYSHEVA 1980 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow City Court   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 05/04/2023     26588/23* 27/06/2023 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich GORCHAKOV 1984     Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 27/02/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - detention from 6.55 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 3.00 a.m. on 28/02/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§   121-22, 10 April 2018)   26650/23* 20/06/2023 Andrey Sergeyevich LANDO 1993     Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 20/02/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 9.45 p.m. on 24/02/2022 until 5.30 a.m. on 25/02/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018)   27042/23* 15/06/2023 Alyona Sergeyevna REZNICHENKO 1996     Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 15/02/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.30 p.m. until 9.20 p.m. on 06/03/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018)   27118/23* 15/06/2023 Karina Olegovna SHEYFER 1993     Protest against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 15/02/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5.07 p.m. until 10.40 p.m. on 27/02/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018)