CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 7 septembre 2023
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-227928
- Date
- 7 septembre 2023
- Publication
- 7 septembre 2023
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s803A0776 { height:57.5pt } .sC444E8B1 { height:42.2pt } .s28016D70 { height:49.45pt } Published on 2 October 2023   THIRD SECTION Application no.   39222/21 Andrey Dmitriyevich PROGUNOV against Russia and 27 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 7 September 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts); Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014; and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative charges Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law     39222/21* 28/07/2021 Andrey Dmitriyevich PROGUNOV 1998 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention of 10 days Moscow City Court 04/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 3.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 10 p.m. on 01/02/2021, for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 04/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based and to submit evidence, including video recordings and photos, in defence of the applicant’s version of events on an equal footing with the prosecution;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the first-instance court was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.     40195/21* 27/07/2021 Dmitriy Ivanovich GUZOV 2000 Arkadiy Vitalyevich Shindyapin Moscow Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention of 10 days Moscow City Court 05/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 5.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 05/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 01/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.     40415/21 24/07/2021 Aleksandr Sergeyevich SAVINOV 1989 Sergey Mikhaylovich Shimovolos Nizhniy Novgorod Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 10/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 12.15   p.m. to 6 p.m. on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 10/06/2021.     40845/21* 02/08/2021 Vadim Nabilevich MAKOVEYEV 1992 Mariya Olegovna Eysmont Moscow Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention of 7   days Moscow City Court 04/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 5 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 12.50 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 04/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     41251/21* 27/07/2021 Sergey Vasilyevich LOGINOV 1981 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention of 12 days Moscow City Court 12/02/2021 Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - 31/01-02/02/2021, van, overcrowding, no access to potable water, no access to food, 23 persons spent a night in van, no sleeping places;   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 3 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and bringing the applicant to the court hearing, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 12/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     41304/21* 31/07/2021 Yelena Mikhaylovna VOTCHITSEVA 1991 Mariya Olegovna Eysmont Moscow Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention of 8   days Moscow City Court 05/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 2 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 11.50 a.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: 05/02/2021, Moscow City Court;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     41468/21* 31/07/2021 Mark Yevgenyevich VDOVICHENKO 1996 Mariya Olegovna Eysmont Moscow Manifestation in support of Navalny   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO detention of 12 days Moscow City Court 10/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from about 3   p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 12.45 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     42479/21* 05/08/2021 Vladislav Andreyevich YUNDIN 1998   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Moscow, Matrosskaya Tishina 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention of 13   days Moscow City Court 05/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 2.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 6.40 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and bringing the applicant to court hearing, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 05/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the first-instance court was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.     42567/21* 09/08/2021 Nika Andreyevna VEDRNIKOVA 1989 Ilya Valeryevich Tkachenko Gatchina Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   St Petersburg City Court 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention of 10 days St Petersburg 10/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 1.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 11.55 a.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 10/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   43240/21* 09/08/2021 Roman Igorevich BATUSOV 1995 Mariya Olegovna Eysmont Moscow Manifestation in support of Navalnyy Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention of 10 days Moscow City Court 10/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 4 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 3.30 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and bringing the applicant to court hearing, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   45838/21* 02/09/2021 Dmitriy Yevgenyevich PLAKSIN 1989 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 17/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 12.25   p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and bringing the applicant to the court hearing, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 17/03/2021.   45996/21* 08/09/2021 Samat Serkbayevich MURZAGALIYEV 2000 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Moscow Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Saratov 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Saratov Regional Court 23/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 5.40 p.m. to 8.40 p.m. on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Saratov Regional Court, 23/03/2021.   46419/21* 03/09/2021 Aleksandr Vyacheslavovich LITVINOV 1998 Veronika Yuryevna Karagodina St Petersburg Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   St Petersburg 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention of   5 days St Petersburg City Court 09/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 4 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 6.20 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence and bringing the applicant to court hearing, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: St   Petersburg City Court, 09/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   46712/21* 11/09/2021 Polina Sergeyevna KUSKOVA 2000   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Kirov 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Kirov Regional Court 11/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Kirov Regional Court, 11/03/2021.   46780/21* 12/08/2021 Grigoriy Vyacheslavovich SEMKIN 1990   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Vladimir 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Vladimir Regional Court 01/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Vladimir Regional Court, 01/03/2021.   46846/21* 14/09/2021 Arevik Grachikovna KHARAZYAN 1998 Mariya Olegovna Eysmont Moscow Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Moscow 02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO 10 days of detention Moscow City Court 22/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 11.30   p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 1.37 p.m. on 03/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence and bringing the applicant to the court hearing, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   47044/21 04/09/2021 Viktoriya Viktorovna GUSHCHINA 1989 Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo Barnaul Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Anapa 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Krasnodar Regional Court 17/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 4.10 p.m. to 8.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 17/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   47102/21* 15/09/2021 Ilgiz Shamilevich TAKTASHOV 1970 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   St Petersburg 31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 25/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 1.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 2.00 a.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: St   Petersburg City Court 25/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.     47489/21* 05/09/2021 Yasmina Sabitovna OMEROVICH 1998 Georgiy Eduardovich Tevosov Moscow Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Moscow 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 12/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 12/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   48045/21* 20/09/2021 Yuriy Alekseyevich PROTSENKO 1961 Tatyana Georgiyevna Martynova Pskov Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Pskov 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Pskov Regional Court 22/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 2 p.m. to unspecified time on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Pskov Regional Court, 22/03/2021.   49509/21* 01/10/2021 Anatoliy Sergeyevich MAVRENKOV 1995 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Murmansk 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Murmansk Regional Court 12/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 3.35 p.m. on 30/01/2021 to 10 a.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence and bringing the applicant to the court hearing, raised on appeal.     49518/21 14/09/2021 Yevgeniy Vladimirovich TUMANIS 1982 Varvara Dmitriyevna Mikhaylova St Petersburg Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Blagoveshchensk 23/01/2021 articles 20.2 § 5 and 20.6.1 § 1 of CAO fines of RUB   10,000 and 5,000 Amur Regional Court 25/03/2021 and 17/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 2.30 p.m. to about 7   p.m. on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decisions: Amur Regional Court, 17/03/2021 and 25/03/2021.   49671/21* 16/09/2021 Kseniya Aleksandrovna KUZMINA 1990 Danil Ilnurovich Nurgaleyev Kazan Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Kazan 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 31/03/2021     49882/21 22/09/2021 Kseniya Anatolyevna GOLUBTSOVA 1990 Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo Barnaul Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Moscow 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 26/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 5 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 7 p.m. on 25/01/2021 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence and bringing the applicant to the court hearing, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 26/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   50076/21* 23/09/2021 Igor Olegovich GLADKIY 1998 Arkadiy Vitalyevich Shindyapin Moscow Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 17/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 2.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 17/05/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   51020/21* 01/10/2021 Nikolay Aleksandrovich ZHIGALOV 1990 Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova Kolomna Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Moscow 02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 25/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 1.30 p.m. to unspecified time on 02/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 25/05/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.   52295/21* 11/10/2021 Anastasiya Vladimirovna TSVETKOVA 1998 Tatyana Georgiyevna Martynova Pskov Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Pskov 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   12,000 Pskov Regional Court 12/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 12.30   p.m. to unspecified time on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Pskov Regional Court, 12/04/2021.   53165/21 23/09/2021 Aleksey Viktorovich PLOSKAREV 1975 Aleksey Vladimirovich Bushmakov Yekaterinburg Manifestation in support of Navalnyy   Ekaterinburg 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 20 hours of community service Sverdlovsk Regional Court 17/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention from 12.00   p.m. to 5.20   p.m. on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. Final decision: Sverdlovsk Regional Court 17/06/2021.  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 7 septembre 2023
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-227928
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel