CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 7 juin 2023

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sCCB68666 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:36pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2023)146 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 11 cases against Ukraine   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 7 June 2023 at the 1468 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 5068/20 BEZRUCHENKOV AND OTHERS 10/06/2021 10/06/2021 56470/18 DOGNON 05/12/2019 05/12/2019 39794/20 IVANCHAK 10/06/2021 10/06/2021 7762/10 KANTSARA AND OTHERS 06/07/2017 06/07/2017 19061/20 LAVRYSHYN AND AKSYONOVA 15/04/2021 15/04/2021 10990/20 LUZAN AND OTHERS 30/09/2021 30/09/2021 9493/21 MARTYNYUK AND KOZMINA 13/01/2022 13/01/2022 38946/20 PODYAPOLSKYY AND SULYMA 16/09/2021 16/09/2021 40506/07+ SHVETS AND OTHERS 12/01/2017 12/01/2017 17843/19 ZAKUTNIY 06/02/2020 06/02/2020 3391/17 ZVARYCH AND MARCHEVSKA 22/07/2021 22/07/2021   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established mainly on account of excessive length of criminal/civil proceedings as well as the lack of effective remedy in this respect (violations of Articles 6, paragraph 1, and 13);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the action plan provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2023)338 );   Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved in these cases, given that the criminal/civil proceedings have been terminated and that all required individual measures have also been taken in respect of the other violations found by the Court namely that the obligation not to abscond was lifted from the applicants in the cases of Kantsara and Others and Shvets and Others ;   Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined in the framework of the Merit and Svetlana Naumenko groups of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;   Noting that questions related to excessive length of the obligation not to abscond, raised by the cases Kantsara and Others and Shvets and Others , are being examined by the Committee in the context of the supervision of the Ivanov group of cases;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.