CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 4 mai 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2962756B { height:57.15pt } .s7F740776 { height:57.3pt } .s3A357E38 { text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s1DE04BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } .s97C4337 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } Published on 30 May 2023   FIFTH SECTION Application no.   30580/21 Ikhtiyar Maratovich URAZALIN against Russia and 30 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 4 May 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention relating to permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities which are the subject of well ‑ established case law of the Court (see Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos.   27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention (permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Detention facility Period of detention Specific circumstances Other complaints under well-established case-law     30580/21 17/05/2021 Ikhtiyar Maratovich URAZALIN 1971 Aleksandr Vladimirovich Kukharev Moscow SIZO-2 Nizhniy Novgorod Region 28/05/2020- 17/11/2020 opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities.     30856/21 26/05/2021 Magomed-Rashid Mukharbekovich GAZIKOV 1978     IK-31 Komi Republic 05/02/2020-25/02/2021 opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities     30857/21 28/05/2021 Oleg Aleksandrovich PODUSHKA 1991     IK-25 Komi Republic 26/12/2016 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities.     37223/21 09/07/2021 Denis Vasilyevich MOLCHANOV 1988     IK-25 Komi Republic, squad 9 February 2020 -ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities.     37340/21* 07/07/2021 Aleksey Yevgenyevich LOSHMANOV 1981     IK-29 Kirov Region 24/12/2020 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities.     37364/21* 07/07/2021 Oleg Aleksandrovich FEOKTISTOV 1983     SIZO-1 Smolensk Region 18/11/2018 - 15/02/2021 opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance       37642/21 30/06/2021 Aleksey Veniaminovich RASTVOROV 1982     IK-25 Komi Republic multiple placements (33) in punishment cells between 06/08/2018 and 18/04/2021, periods of placement from 5 to 15 days detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities.     37902/21* 22/07/2021 Igor Sergeyevich BUSHUYEV 1985 Aleksey Konstantinovich Yevsyunin Moscow SIZO-4 Moscow 10/10/2018 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities     Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - during the period: 07/07/2020 - 21/06/2021, failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint failure to conduct the proceedings diligently leading to excessive length of detention on remand     39075/21* 27/08/2021 Yuliy Alekseyevich NESTEROV 1996     SIZO-1 St Petersburg 23/07/2020 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities and in respect of placement in a metal cage in the courtroom   Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - Placement in a metal cage in the courtroom of the Dzerzhinskiy District Court of St Petersburg, between 23/07/2020 and 29/07/2021   39208/21* 12/07/2021 Aleksandr Nikolayevich CHURAKOV 1974     SIZO-1 St Petersburg 21/07/2018 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - placement in a metal cage during the hearings (in a trial court as well as via video-link) in the Nevskiy Disctrict Court of St Petersburg, St Petersburg City Court from 18/12/2019 to 12/03/2021     Art. 8 (1) - restrictions on family visits in pre-trial facilities - inability to have long-term family visits in SIZO-1 St   Petersburg   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities, in respect of placement in a metal cage during the hearings and refusals to have long-term family visits     Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - between the remand prison and courthouse pending criminal proceedings (39 times) between 18/12/2019 and 12/03/2021- placement in a single occupancy cell in a prison van; transfers lasted   from 1 to 3 hours   42046/21* 27/09/2021 Viktor Aleksandrovich MYSIN 1978     IK-6 Khabarovsk Region 01/04/2021 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   42211/21* 06/08/2021 Murat Kachakovich AKAVOV 1968     IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region 30/10/2011 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room     42315/21* 04/08/2021 Nikolay Anatolyevich PASHKEYEV 1989     IK-25 Komi Republic 24/12/2020 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   50358/21* 20/09/2021 Vitaliy Vladimirovich KABANOV 1979     IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region 25/05/2018 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   50565/21 29/09/2021 Andrey Vyacheslavovich FEDORENKO 1987     IK-25 Komi Republic 2017 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   53110/21 06/10/2021 Aleksandr Pavlovich KRUTIKHIN 1982     IK-25 Komi Republic 23/07/2017 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged detention in different cells with video surveillance, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   54537/21 14/10/2021 Stepan Leonidovich PALKIN 1988     IK-25 Komi Republic 31/01/2010 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   54982/21* 27/09/2021 Maksim Yevgenyevich BUZOV 1987     Settlement colony no. 10 Irkutsk Region 23/09/2021 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport     Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transfers by van between the colony and workplace, 18/08/2021-23/09/2021, passive smoking, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding   55397/21* 24/10/2021 Ruslan Nikolayevich VASILYEV 1986     IK-24 Komi Republic 12/08/2019 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   56223/21 22/01/2022 Aleksey Yevgenyevich ARZYUTOV       IK-25 Komi Republic 25/11/2020 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   56224/21 13/12/2021 Demyan Aleksandrovich SHEPELEV 1989     IZ-3 Komi Republic 27/06/2021-17/07/2021   23/07/2021-29/07/2021 detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities       508/22* 24/11/2021 Aleksandr Pavlovich BONDARENKO 1986     SIZO-3 Komi Republic 21/07/2018 - 09/07/2021 detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities     Prot. 1 Art. 3 - ineligibility to vote in or stand for elections - inability to vote in elections of members of the State Duma (Parliament) in 2021   1721/22* 09/01/2022 Andrey Anatolyevich SHESTERNIN 1966     IK-6 Khabarovsk Region 09/09/2019 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   1828/22* 30/08/2021 Vladimir Vasilyevich IVANOV 1957     IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region 02/10/2019-03/03/2021 detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   1829/22* 07/12/2021 Andrey Alekseyevich SEMENOV 1980     IK-8 Komi Republic 11/12/2020 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   2244/22 30/11/2021 Sergey Vasilyevich MARTYSHOV 1983     IZ-3 Belgorod Region 17/10/2019 - 22/07/2021 detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   2932/22* 03/12/2021 Vladimir Ivanovich GOLBAN 1962     IK-6 Khabarovsk Region 17/12/2020 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   3986/22* 27/04/2022 Zafar Shodiyevich KURBONOV 1980     IK-6 Krasnoyarsk Region   06/10/2016 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance     5083/22* 27/12/2021 Viktor Gennadyevich BARDAKOV 1979     IK-8 Komi Republic 17/05/2017 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport     Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - van, train, transit cell, 24/07/2021-03/08/2021, 0.32-0.5 sq. m., overcrowding, lack or inadequate furniture, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, lack of privacy for toilet   5709/22 20/12/2021 Dmitriy Vyacheslavovich BURDYKO 1981     FKU LIU-32 Krasnoyarsk Region Beginning date unclear - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   8073/22 18/01/2022 Dmitriy Dmitriyevich SAVVIN 1986     UK-49 Komi Republic April 2019 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities