CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 2 mars 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 27 March 2023   SECOND SECTION Application no.   7337/19 Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich KARPOV against Russia and 9 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 2 March 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern the complaints raised under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention relating to the lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Karelin v.   Russia, no.   926/08, 20 September 2016).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth/registration Representative’s name and location Penalty Date of final domestic decision Name of court Other complaints under well-established case-law     7337/19* 21/01/2019 Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich KARPOV 1988 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius administrative detention of 12 days     administrative fine of RUB 30,000 15/09/2018, Oktyabrskiy District Court of Voronezh   29/07/2022, Voronezh Regional Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 07/09/2018 the applicant was taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019)   Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - Conviction under Article 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO for anti-war video recordings published on the applicant’s Youtube channel/ administrative fine of RUB 30,000/ Voronezh Regional Court on 29/07/2022 (appeal)     16154/19* 12/03/2019   OOO ORION       administrative fine of RUB 300,000 12/09/2018, Azov Town Court of the Rostov Region       27375/19* 07/05/2019 Aleksey Aleksandrovich KHIMCHENKOV 1984     administrative fine of RUB 5,000 06/12/2018, Vologda Town Court       43682/19* 31/07/2019 Aleksey Viktorovich KATERBUZOV 1976     administrative fines of RUB 75,000, RUB 75,000 and RUB 100,000 31/01/2019, Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court   14/02/2019, Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court   06/06/2019, Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court       46459/19* 27/08/2019 Artem Aleksandrovich LUKIN 1996     administrative detention of 5 days 01/08/2019, Moscow City Court       49801/19* 14/09/2019 Pavel Pavlovich MALYSHEV 1985 Aleksey Borisovich Vologin Volsk administrative fine of RUB 30 000, suspension of the driving licence for 1   year and 9 months 10/09/2019, Volskiy District Court of the Saratov Region       51465/19* 22/09/2019 Denis Mikhaylovich SEMENOV 1983 Aleksey Alekseyevich Yemelin Volsk administrative fine of RUB 30,000, suspension of the driving licence for 1   year and 6 months 23/05/2019, Volskiy District Court of the Saratov Region       52125/19* 21/09/2019 Dmitriy Yuryevich BEZBEKOV 1985 Aleksey Borisovich Vologin Volsk administrative fine of RUB 30,000, suspension of the driving licence for 1   year and 8 months 12/09/2019, Krasnoarmeysk Town Court of the Saratov Region Art. 6 (3) (c) - free legal assistance - the applicant was deprived of free legal assistance in the administrative-offence proceedings, in particular during the trial on 23/07/2019, which led to the final judgment on 12/09/2019 (Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998/08, §§ 90-95, 19   November 2015)     10657/20* 18/02/2020 Olga Viktorovna GAVRIKOVA 1955 Anna Borisovna Karakozova Moscow administrative fine of RUB 20, 000 22/08/2019, Moscow City Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 27/07/2019 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   12071/20* 25/02/2020 Yana Sergeyevna OPARINA 1995 Yevgeniy Valeryevich Kulakov Arkhangelsk administrative fine of RUB 30,000, suspension of the driving licence for 1   year and 7 months 19/11/2019, Solombalskiy District Court of Arkhangelsk