CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 2 mars 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 27 March 2023   SECOND SECTION Application no.   711/18 Sergey Vladimirovich POPOV against Russia and 9 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 2 March 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern the complaints raised under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention relating to the lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Karelin v.   Russia, no.   926/08, 20 September 2016).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth/registration Representative’s name and location Penalty Date of final domestic decision Name of court Other complaints under well-established case-law     711/18* 08/12/2017 Sergey Vladimirovich POPOV 1971 Aleksandr Dmitriyevich Peredruk St Petersburg administrative detention of 5 days   administrative fine of RUB 10,000 16/06/2017, St   Petersburg City Court   21/06/2017, St   Petersburg City Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 12-14/06/2017 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - convicted twice for participation in one public event     22829/18* 08/05/2018 Vasiliy Yuryevich ZHIRKEVICH 1956   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow administrative fine of RUB 10,000 30/03/2018, Moscow City Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention for more than 3 hours on 12/06/2017 for the sole purpose of drawing up a report     12299/19* 23/01/2019 Fedor Vladimirovich YARUNICHEV 1972 Yevgeniy Valeryevich Kulakov Arkhangelsk administrative fine of RUB 30,000, suspension of the driving licence for 1   year and 9 months 26/12/2018, Solombalskiy District Court of Arkhangelsk       52429/19* 27/09/2019   OOO SK IVIKON 2005 Artem Vyacheslavovich Syntin Omsk administrative fine of RUB 100,000   administrative fine of RUB 200,000 12/04/2019, Kirovskiy District Court of Omsk   30/04/2019, Omskiy District Court of the Omsk Region       59586/19* 05/11/2019 Boris Pavlovich USHAKOV 1983 Natalya Vladimirovna Korchuganova Moscow administrative detention of 5 days 09/05/2019, Leninskiy District Court of Vladimir       16523/20* 14/03/2020 Dmitriy Aleksandrovich LYSENKO 1982 Natalya Andreyevna Balog Krasnoyarsk administrative fine of RUB 15,000 16/09/2019, Moscow City Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 27/07/2019 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based     17825/20 30/03/2020 Oleg Aleksandrovich MOROZOV 1990 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius administrative fine of RUB 15,000 28/11/2019, Moscow City Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 27/07/2019 for the sole purpose of drawing a record of administrative offence   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based     21258/20* 12/05/2020 Stepan Yegorovich PAZENKO 1995 Anastasiya Nikolayevna Sirotina Moscow administrative fine of RUB 10,000 12/11/2019, Moscow City Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 27/07/2019 for the sole purpose of drawing a record of administrative offence, the applicant raised his complaint in the course of the proceedings against him   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based     21471/20* 27/04/2020 Vladimir Gennadyevich DERYABIN 1986 Roman Filippovich Ustinov Moscow administrative fine of RUB 30,000, suspension of the driving licence for 1   year and 6 months 27/11/2019, Babushkinskiy District Court of Moscow     22068/20* 17/04/2020 Yekaterina Vasilyevna KRASNOVA 1990 Roman Filippovich Ustinov Moscow administrative fine of RUB 30,000, suspension of the driving licence for 1   year and 6 months 23/10/2019, Tushinskiy District Court of Moscow