CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 30 janvier 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 20 February 2023   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 25093/17 Yuriy Mykolayovych PAVLYSHYN against Ukraine lodged on 20 March 2017 communicated on 30 January 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns a complaint about the ineffective investigation into beatings inflicted on the applicant, a father, in front of his two minor children, on 17 February 2012. The assault took place in a yard near a multi ‑ storied building where he lived, by his neighbours, Mr and Mrs R., on the ground of a dispute over a dog’s behaviour, which Mrs R. had been walking. The applicant sustained minor bodily injuries, particularly, concussion, contused wound, abrasions and a cut wound on the head, and a bruise on the left thigh. The investigation into the events, commenced in 2013, is still pending. The applicant raised a complaint under Article 3 of the Convention. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Having regard to the procedural protection from inhuman or degrading treatment (see Muta v. Ukraine , no. 37246/06, § 59, 31 July 2012; Skorokhodov v. Ukraine , no. 56697/09, § 32, 14 November 2013, and Aleksandr Nikonenko v. Ukraine , no. 54755/08, § 43, 14 November 2013), was the investigation in the present case by the domestic authorities in breach of Article   3 of the Convention?