CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 14 décembre 2022

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s2CECB0A7 { height:12.65pt } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6525A7E3 { height:6pt } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s358E564 { height:6.9pt } .sD5AE2CC6 { height:4.9pt } .s358E568 { height:6.5pt } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2E49B105 { background-color:#ffffff } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s58231305 { text-decoration:underline; color:#000000; background-color:#ffffff } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s55070D65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:35.45pt; text-align:justify } .s2EAAAA4F { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)435 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Seven cases against Türkiye   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 December 2022 at the 1452 nd meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)     Application Nos. Cases Judgment of Final on 5981/03 KESER AND KÖMÜRCÜ 23/06/2009 23/09/2009 36672/97 KURNAZ AND OTHERS 24/07/2007 24/10/2007 29675/02 LEYLA ALP AND OTHERS 10/12/2013 10/03/2014 23698/07 MİMTAŞ 19/03/2013 19/06/2013 42136/06 PEKER (No. 2) 12/04/2011 12/07/2011 43044/05+ SACILIK AND OTHERS 05/07/2011 14/04/2015 05/10/2011 14/09/2015 7309/04 VEFA SERDAR 27/01/2015 01/06/2015   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of death or ill-treatment during raids to quell prison riots or during related prison transfers and/or the lack of effective investigation into the events (violations of the substantive and/or procedural aspects of Articles 2 or 3 of the Convention);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the information provided by the government as regards the individual measures in these cases (see document   DH-DD(2022)1349-rev ) and noted with deep regret that no further individual measures are possible in these cases; having moreover noted that the just satisfaction amounts were paid by the government of the respondent State;   Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to t he shortcomings found by the Court in these judgments continue to be examined within the framework of the Gomi and Others ( application No. 35962/97 ) group and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and;   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.