CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 18 septembre 2022
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-219846
- Date
- 18 septembre 2022
- Publication
- 18 septembre 2022
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 3 October 2022   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 24008/20 Henk Jan HESSELINK against the Netherlands lodged on 11 June 2020 communicated on 18 September 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged disproportionate use of violence against the applicant by two civil servants with investigative powers ( buitengewone opsporingsambtenaren ) who applied a so-called neck hold ( nekklem ) when arresting him. The applicant had been hitting the vehicle of the civil servants and had reacted verbally aggressive against them for crossing his newly seeded lawn when they were leaving his farm. The application also concerns an alleged lack of an effective investigation into the incident. The applicant relies on Article 3 and Article 13 of the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Has the applicant been subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment in breach with Article 3 of the Convention? In particular, was the force used in respect of the applicant during his arrest (the “neck hold”) strictly necessary in the circumstances of the case (see Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, §§ 81-90 and §§ 100-101, ECHR 2015)?   2.     Having regard to the procedural protection from inhuman and degrading treatment, did the investigation conducted by the domestic authorities comply with the requirements under Article   3 of the Convention?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 18 septembre 2022
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-219846
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel