CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 31 mai 2022

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 20 June 2022   SECOND SECTION Application no. 21783/22 Ozgur CAKMAK against Denmark lodged on 26 April 2022 communicated on 31 May 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant is a Turkish national, born in Denmark. By a judgment which became final on 28 October 2021 the applicant was convicted, notably of attempted murder committed on 11 April 2013 . He was sentenced to 6   years and 3 months’ imprisonment. Moreover, he was expelled from Denmark with a life-long ban on returning. The applicant complained that the order expelling him from Denmark was in violation of Article 8 of the Convention. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Having regard, in particular, to the fact that the applicant was born in Denmark, and was sentenced to 6 years and 3 months’ imprisonment for crimes committed on 11 April 2013, would the order to expel him from the country with a permanent re-entry ban be in breach of Article 8 of the Convention (see, for example, Abdi v. Denmark , no. 41643/19, 14   September 2021)?